A searchable audio archive from the 2013-2016 legislative sessions of the North Carolina General Assembly.

searching for


Reliance on Information Posted The information presented on or through the website is made available solely for general information purposes. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of this information. Any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk. We disclaim all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on such materials by you or any other visitor to the Website, or by anyone who may be informed of any of its contents. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.

House | May 13, 2013 | Chamber | Session

Full MP3 Audio File

Members please take your seats. Visitors please retire from the Chamber. Members and visitors in the Gallery please turn of all cellular phones and personal electronic devices. Without objection Rule 12-B is suspended. Ladies and gentlemen, the prayer for the day is to be offered by Representative Michaux. I do not see him in the Chamber. We will be at ease for a minute before we continue. It is now 6:05. We will wait another minute. Ladies and gentleman. If the House will come to order. We will probably just change the order for later this week. Apparently, Representative Michaux is busy at the time and we want to go ahead and commence with sessions. The prayer will be offered by Representative Jimmy Dixon. Members and visitors in the Gallery please stand and please remain standing for the Pledge of Allegiance. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Kind Father in Heaven, we pause for a few moments for beginning this session to give thee thanks for many wonderful blessings that thy has bestowed upon us. We are grateful Father for the freedom and liberty, which have allowed us to come here. We are grateful for the freedom and liberty that allow those who disagree to express their disagreements. We ask thee heavenly Father that we might have the discernment and the wisdom to conduct ourselves property before thee and in a manner that will be beneficial to ourselves, to our constituents, and to the entire State of North Carolina. We pray Father that that they would look over and watch over Representative J.H. Langdon as he's undergoing surgery at this moment. Will thou please bless the physicians and others who are caring for him that they might do so in a manner that will be most beneficial to his complete recovery. For this we do pray for in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United State of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Representative Moore is recognized. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Mr. Speaker the journal for Thursday, May 9, 2013 has been examined and found to be correct. I move this approval is ready. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Representative Moore moves that the journal from May 9th be approved as written. All in favor say "Aye". All opposed say "No. The aye's have it. The journal's approved as written. Petitions, memorials or papers addressed to the General Assembly of the House. Ratification of Bills to resolutions the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Enrolling clerk reports following resolution ?? presented to the office of Secretary of State House ?? resolution 444 ??? Resolution is very informative and TE to the North Carolina Industrial Commission. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Chapter Bills being noted. Reports of standing committees and permanent subcommittees. Representative Moffitt is recognized to send forth committee report the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Representative Moffitt for the Regulatory Reform Committee House Bill 796 exempts certain columbariums of Cemetery Act, favorable. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Calendar. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: House Bill 774 Building Code excludes primitive structures favor is to the Committee. Substitute unfavorable as to the original Bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Committee substitute calendar original Bill unfavorable calendar. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Committee substitute #1 for House Bill 480. Environmental Permitting Reform favor is to the Committee substitute #2, unfavor is to the Committee substitute #1. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Committee substitute #2 calendar. Committee substitute #1 unfavorable calendar. Representative Brawley and I will recognize the Fourth Committee Report. The clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Representative Brawley and Iler Transportation Committee House Bill 1002 Rail Car Release, Town of Belmont, favorable calendar.

House Bill 428, North Carolina School Bus Safety Act, favorable as the to Committee Substitute, unfavorable as to the original bill. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Committee Substitute bill calendar, original bill unfavorable, calendar. [SPEAKER CHANGE] House Bill 623, Modify Weight Limits for Line Trucks, favorable as to the Committee Substitute, unfavorable as to the original bill. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Committee Substitute bill calendar, original bill unfavorable, calendar. [SPEAKER CHANGE] House Bill 626, Promptly Notify Local 911 of Towed Vehicles, favorable as to Committee Substitute, unfavorable as to the original bill. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Committee Substitute bill calendared, original bill unfavorable, calendar. [SPEAKER CHANGE] House Bill 684, Increase Driveway Safety on Curvy Roads, favorable as to the Committee Substitute, unfavorable as to the original bill. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Committee Substitute bill calendared, original bill unfavorable, calendar. [SPEAKER CHANGE] House Bill 727, Alternate Procedure for Obtaining Salvage Title, favorable as to the Committee Substitute, unfavorable as to the original bill. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Committee Substitute bill calendared, original bill unfavorable, calendar. [SPEAKER CHANGE] House Bill 759, Required Number of Operating Brake Lights, favorable as to the Committee Substitute, unfavorable as to the original bill. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Committee Substitute bill calendared, original bill unfavorable, calendar. [SPEAKER CHANGE] House Bill 267, NCGA Prior Approval Interstate Tolling, favorable as to the Committee Substitute, unfavorable as to the original bill, and serially referred to Appropriations. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The Committee Substitute will be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations. Original bill unfavorable, calendar. [SPEAKER CHANGE] House Bill 620, Streamline Sales for Mechanics Liens Without Prejudice and serially referred to Judiciary Subcommittee A. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The bill will be re-referred to Judiciary Subcommittee A. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Representatives Stone and Warren are recognized to send forth committee reports. The Clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Representative Stone and Warren for the Government Committee. House Bill 857, Public Contracts, Construction Methods, Design Bill, Public, Private, favorable as to the Committee Substitute, unfavorable as to the original bill and serially referred to Finance. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The Committee Substitute will be re-referred to the Committee on Finance. Original bill unfavorable, calendar. Messages from the Senate, the Clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 193, a bill to be entitled An Act to Prohibit Local School Administrative Units from Accessing Indirect Costs to Child Nutrition Program Unless the Program is Financially Solvent and to Promote Optimal Pricing for Child Nutrition Program Food Supplies as Recommended by Joint Legislative Program Valuable Oversight Committee Based on Recommendations From Program Evaluation Divisions. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Rules, calendar. Operations of the House. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 252, a bill to be entitled An Act to Increase Criminal Penalties for Certain Violations of Controlled Substances Act. [SPEAKER CHANGE] On 193, strike. Rules calendar Operations of the House add Education. If favorable, Finance. On 252, Judiciary Subcommittee B. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 264, a bill to be entitled An Act to Strengthen the Nuisance Laws to Close Down Businesses that Repeatedly Sell Controlled Substances. It's my fault. I messed it up here. [SPEAKER CHANGE] That's OK. I caught it I just... [SPEAKER CHANGE] You want me to read it? [SPEAKER CHANGE] On Senate Bill 264, Judiciary Subcommittee C. The Clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Senate Bill 101, a bill to be entitled An Act to Make Technical Corrections to the General Statutes as Recommended by the General Statutes Commission. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Rules, calendar. Operations to the House. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Senate Bill 288, a bill to be entitled An Act Concerning Filing of Vacancies, Filling of Vacancies on Board of Commissions of Wake County. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Government. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Senate Bill 314, a bill to be entitled An Act Authorizing the County of Durham to Construct Water Treatment, Waste Water Treatment Plant Projects without Complying with Specified Provisions of Article 8 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Rules, calendar. Operations to the House. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 315, an bill to be entitled An Act Authorizing the City of Durham to Use Design Build Delivery Methods for Design and Construction of Police Headquarters and Annex Facility, Two Police Service Centers and a 911 Facility. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Rules, calendar. Operations to the House. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 380, a bill to be entitled An Act to Make Adjustments on a Fee Schedule for Permits for Sanitary Landfills and Transfer Stations to Reflect Extension of the Duration of These Permits as Directed by SL 2012-187, as Recommended by an Environmental Review Commission. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Environment, if favorable Finance. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Committee Substitute for Senate Bill...

to me, that they're not informed scared off-by the Commission on AIDS city government of me, and that the people and is awaiting an inspection for Chaminade College and ice today said that isn't that why is it a 45 AM, back to streamline the process of the time a first aid agencies under Medicaid Services , and the sentence until coordinated company, have been split Boston’s aware of the projects on its knees at the number 10% I'm 30 of them did not actively the distribution of the batter-date loss to buy time judiciary subcommittee that ?? has been hardly had ages place of the content of the pages of the Annuls and on-Haitian ?? ?? at an end date has informally at the city's events in a somewhat like six and currencies of Florence and the timer on pages of RSA see justice the supreme court Justice Paul Davies 1. does not belong time off time agencies and we are all Fernando police at four and that was identified only from the foresight say times have never to have 5000 myriad of the general sales in shady but I'll just seen body weight and ?? out of one of its Robert Jenkins made aware thirties Johnson to one review the offer ?? say that in the right wrist scene of a deal parish volatile the D'Amato of its existence tiny and wait until found comfort and is vs round in the Disney and rile faces was only a very interesting process and are already saying that ruins of a time of the sweetness is the Risley is that that is probably the busiest weekend on display for some of your work of intent is seen only by the worry about the whole-heartedly data that is wrong word on his way also, it was a way that the numbers in the times hundreds of ages and citizen, building friendships that central parity on this would serve as a band of a strongly worded optimizations members was properly of green time -house to house and like some of the person at a time as the date is pressed white wine, why didn't the lesson I have a date yet for chapel hill on one of the estate of the service, time ?? , as the 26, White House bill by 26 building, acting as the service that operate departments and the jaguar Johnson call for ?? ?? ?? …………………………

Waddell please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To speak on the bill Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman recognizes the man in red. [SPEAKER CHANGES] [LAUGH] Thank you Mr. Speaker. Ladies and gentlemen of the House. This is your final chance to vote on a voluntary annexation bill with no opposition. I urge your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate. If not the question before the House is the passage of House bill 526 on its third reading. All in favor will vote aye. All those opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 108 having voted in the affirmative, one in the negative. House bill 526 has passed its third reading and will be sent to the Senate. House bill 562 the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Graham please state you purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] I need to change my vote to aye. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman will be recorded as having voted aye. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee, committee substitute for House bill 562 a bill entitled an act to revise and consolidate the charter of the town of Cramerton. General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Members, the, the chair will direct that we are at a ten second count. And we have a calendar that we will get through, a vote count, we have a calendar get through tonight. If for whatever reason your not are able to be at your desk and make if back to your desk by the time I call the roll, if you will wait if we happen to be in the reading of another bill, if you will please wait until the bill is read and I will recognize you at the appropriate time. But you have until the end of session in order to do that this evening. And we will certainly recognize any requests to record or change a vote. Representative Bumgardner please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To speak on this bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you Mr. Speaker. This bill is a local bill that was requested by the town of Cramerton. I don’t know of any opposition. I can’t imagine why there would be. They, they wanna update their town charter that was first written in 1967 and has never been changed. Appreciate your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative McGrady please state your purpose. Further discussion, further debate. If not the question before the House is the passage of the House committee substitute House 562 on its second reading. All in favor vote aye. All opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 111 having voted in the affirmative, none in the negative. The House substitute for House bill 562 has passed its second reading and will remain on the calendar. House bill 567 the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] House bill 567 a bill to be entitled and enact removing certain described property from the corporate limits of the city of Lumberton. General Assembly of North Carolina enact. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Waddell please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you Mr. Speaker. Speak on the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Ladies and gentlemen of the House. This is the exact opposite of the bill that you voted on to start with. But it has no opposition. The city of Lumberton requested this. And I’d appreciate your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate. If not the question before the House is the passage of House bill 567 on its second reading. All in favor vote aye. All opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 110 having voted in the affirmative, two in the negative. House bill 567 has passed its second reading to remain on the calendar. House bill 501 the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee substitute for House bill 501 a bill to be entitled and enact providing that Buncombe County is authorized to construct community college buildings on the campuses of Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College within the county. General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Ramsey please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Send forth an amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to send forth an amendment. The clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Ramsey moves to remove from the bill on page two line three by re-writing the line to read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker, members of the House. This amendment is agreed to by all the parties, the state community college system, Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College and the Buncombe county board of commissioners. We ask for your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Fisher please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To speak to the amendment [CROSSTALK] [SPEAKER CHANGES] The lady is recognized to debate the amendment. The House will come to order. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you Mr. Speaker. Ladies and gentlemen of the House. This is a kumbaya moment for us on Buncombe county bills

I request your support. thank you very much [SPEAKER CHANGES] brother disgusted by the Divine of the amendment do not question before the house is the message of the members informed by revs and Randy to the house committee substitute browse don't bottle one, all in favour, but I all opposed but note Bartlett Bartlett machine recorded about one hundred thirteen have invited affirmative non negative demon advances were now back on the bill runs in Ramsey PlayStation purpose is to demonstrate an estimated bill as amended, [SPEAKER CHANGES] as representatives are eloquently the time this evening. this is a film by a bill in support of our state community college system Patriot Act American County Walla Walla County to commence out significant capital construction or maybe that campus more efficiently and effectively. when asked for your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] further discussion president, if not a question for the House 's passage. the house committee substituted alkyl, five oh one, as amended, on second reading all a favour say eye will post a note guys have announced ready substitute out of five oh one, as amended, is passed at second reading without objection will be rather time Johnson and North Carolina are the discussion president. I is not a question for the houses. the passage of the House committee since two thousand twelve five oh one, as amended, on its third reading on favour say I all of a sudden have guys haven't the house committee substitute out of five oh one, is amended as passes third reading to building gross and sense of the Senate health bill, five fifty one incorporates [SPEAKER CHANGES] mid-September household by fifty one building title act amended at creating apartments benefit fund for varmint in the city of Wilmington is amended into modified application, GS fifty eight– eightyfour– thirty five to the city of Wilmington North Carolina next presented as a sacred purpose. the real gem is recognized by Bill but the speaker plays into the house. this is a local bill that wasrequested by the city of Wilmington. what this bill does make changes to the local farms released one for the city of Wilmington regarding the transfer of funds to the women's empowerment, benefit,and what it won't do over time it will layout the Board of Trustees to use more funds for active-duty firefighters to build upon solvency and still provide funding to retirees. it comes to you with aunanimous label all written or from both the government committee and the state personnel committee my knowledge there is no opposition and ask for it, rather discussion and not a question ofwhat houses fastest out to substitute out of five fifty one on its second reading I ever say I all say no guys have it. house committee substitute as nobody do want to stress the second reading withoutobjection will be rather time Johnson of North Carolina [SPEAKER CHANGES] discussion further debate, if not a question for the houses. the passage about the five fifty one. house committee substitute out of five fifty one on its third reading. I'll never say I help out as a note as avid as to substitute out the five fifty one expenses. the reading will be sent to the Senate, House Bill one thousand and one. the clerk rate Houston one thousand and one ago Madonna, neck maintenance garden city states will reveal the city 's civil service board Johnson of North Carolina presented Turner PlayStation purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mister Speaker, to become the delays recognized to write about. thank you, ladies and gentlemen of the house. this is a local bill requested by the city of St. Paul to repeal there are civil service, Lord, when it originally was amended, it added some provision about Buncombe County and I believe there's an amendment to come powered by representative future pleasurably stage of purpose and fourth amendment light is recognized as important member of our great recognition but then they all page one, line seven by deleting SL two thousand seven– two thirty eight and subjugating section one SL two thousand and seven– two thirty eight litres recognized the great intimate in a current license is just a tactical change at make sure it at what's happening in this bill does not affect any share of and that we had this request for my local sheriff and I would request your support and I appreciate that my colleague across the ours and Turner for recognizing the amendment and get further discussion further debate on the amendment, if not a question of whether houses the passage of the amendment supported by Representative Fisher, Brownsville one thousand and one old favour,but I all noted Bartlett

The clerk will let the machine record the vote. 114 having voted in the affirmative and none in the negative. The amendment passes. We’re now back on the bill. Further discussion, further debate on the bill? Representative Turner, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHAN This is a simple bill and I appreciate your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of House Bill 1001as amended on its second reading. All in favor say aye. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Aye. [SPEAKER CHANGES] All opposed say no. The ayes have it. House Bill 1001as amended has passed its second reading and without objection. It will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of House Bill 1001 as amended on its third reading. All in favor say aye. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Aye. [SPEAKER CHANGES] All opposed say no. The ayes have it. House Bill 1001 as amended has passed its third reading. The bill will be engrossed and sent to the Senate. House Bill 552 the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] House Bill 552. A bill to be entitled, an act to provide a procedure to remove an area from a county’s service district. General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative McElraft, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The lady is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] We had a great vote on this last Thursday. I appreciate your support on third reading. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate? If not the question before the House is the passage of House Bill 552 on its third reading. All in favor vote aye, all opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will let the machine record the vote. 113 having voted in the affirmative and none in the negative. House Bill 552 has passed its third reading and will be sent to the Senate. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Moore, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Special re-referral of the bill if I might? [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized for a motion. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker, House Bill 267 short title’s Limit Towing on Existing Interstates, move that the bill be removed from the Committee on Appropriations and re-referred to the Committee on Finance. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Without objection, so ordered. House Bill 311 the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee Substitute for House Bill 311, a bill to be entitled, an act to repeal illiteracy tests for voters. General Assembly North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Ladies and gentlemen, Representative Alexander is not in the Chamber. We are going to temporarily displace this bill unless any of the other bill sponsors wish to carry it. Representative Michaux, Representative Jeter? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker? Over here, to your right. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Moore? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Yes this is just a simple bill to. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, sir. This is a bipartisan bill to propose a constitutional amendment to repeal the illiteracy tests that is Section 5. Or not Section 5, Section 3 I believe of the North Carolina constitution. Appreciate your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Michaux, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To speak on the amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Bill. Debate the bill. Mr. Speaker, ladies and gentlemen, has been stated this is something that accidentally got into the constitution back in 1971. The United States Supreme Court has already ruled literacy tests unconstitutional and this by some hook or crook, we don’t know how it got there, but it got there. That was the year we passed our new constitution anyway, so all we’re asking you to do is it just be taken out so that it won’t be a burden to us. Shouldn’t be any problem. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House Committee Substitute for House Bill 311 on its second reading. All in favor vote aye, all opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. Representative Moore, does the gentleman? Representative Moore, does the gentleman wish to record? The clerk will let the machine record the vote. 114 having voted in the affirmative, none in the negative. The House Committee Substitute to House Bill 311 has passed its second reading without, will remain on the calendar. House Bill 343 the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Community Substitute for House Bill 343, a bill to be entitled, an act to eliminate arbitrary elimination caps on district courts. To make clarifications to court fees. To amend the motion fee exemption and to require counties and municipalities to advance fees and to provide priority for the payment of court criminal cost and fees . General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Turner, please state your.

purpose (speaker changes) speak on the bill (speaker changes) the lady's recognized to ?? the bill (speaker changes) thank you Mr speaker ladies and gentlemen of the house this is a bill that says court fees but there are no new fees in it is only a clarification of who's supposed to pay them and when it begins with eliminating arbitration caps there is the business court fee clarification they don't have to pay the extra business fee to court until its referred to business court the clarification agree assessment costs for counter claims and cross claims and civil actions the motion fee exemption which was supposed to expire in July of this year has been extended indefinitely on the child support cases so the county will not have to pay their motion fees when they file child support motions also the counties and municipalities require to advance fees this i believe comes from the eleven budget when the counties were supposed to not be waived of their filing fees when they set up cases the counties are not required to advance this filing fees when they filed the cases they are required to pay that fee within 45 days and if it has not been payed for 90 days then their facility fees checks would be held by the clerks office there also a section on priority payment if anybody has any questions id be happy to answer them (speaker changes) further discussion further debate if not request before the house passage passage of the house substituted the house bill 343 on second agree paper vote aye all opposed vote no for third quote in the vote the clerk will opt the machine for the vote 114 have voted affirmative none of the negative the house can be substituted the house bill 343 has passed in the second reading for main on the calender house bill 628 the clerk will read (speaker changes) good evening house bill 628 will be an act to protect north Carolina timber for use of ? requiring that sustainable building standards not disadvantage or forbid the use of building materials produced in this state Jones sending north Carolina at (speaker changes) a Representative please now state your purpose (speaker changes) to speak on the bill (speaker changes) the lady's recognized the bill (speaker changes) i just want to remind you this bills came up last Wednesday and it protects north Carolina jobs and promotes our homegrown and manufactured products there is an opinion piece on your table that is from former lieutenant Bob Jordan who also operations the Jordan lumber company and he supports this bill this is in front he said this is environmental policy should we promoted and established an encourage the sustainability of our forest not discourage it i would also like to tell you guys i sent you an email i sent you a minute ago of the sibitos review and it said it was saying environmental legislation a sensible bill to make sure north Carolina products and suppliers and not discriminated against when competing for projects financed by taxpayers and i certainly would appreciate your vote on the bill sir i do have an amendment if i could (speaker changes) the lady's recognized forth of the amendment the court will read (speaker changes) ???? to amend the page the bill on one lines 29 through 30 by rewriting which lines to read (speaker changes) the lady's recognized to debate the amendment (speaker changes) this is just the exact same bill but at the bottom its this act that becomes effective October 1 2013 and applies to construction and renovation projects for which the bidding process is initiated on or after that date (speaker changes) further discussion further debate on the amendment ?? dickson please state your purpose (speaker changes) to debate the amendment (speaker changes) the gentleman has recognized to debate the amendment (speaker changes) Mr speakers of the house i think that this is a very good amendment and draws balance i encourage you to vote for it (speaker changes) representative statinburg please state your purpose (speaker changes) speaking the bill (speaker changes) the gentleman will be recognized on the term further discussion further debate on the amendment if not the question before the house is to passage of the amendments and forth by representative present l to the house committee substitute for the house representative 28 all in favor vote aye all opposed vote no the clerk will open the vote the clerk op machine will record the vote 110 having voting the affirmative 1 voting in the negative the amendments passes were now backed.

Representative Steinburg, please state your purpose. [Speaker Changes] To speak on the bill Mr. Speaker. [Speaker Changes] The gentleman is recognized to debate on the bill as amended. [Speaker Changes] Thank you Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentleman of the House. I rise to take a stand on this particular bill. I live in a district heavily comprised of folks in the timber industry, and also my district is home on Newcore steel as well. So this particular bill has caused somewhat of a conflict for me and I would like And this is with all due respect to my very good friends Representatives Presnell and Catlin. A good bill, ideally, is one where both parties are going to be helped. In this particular bill, that is not the case. If we compare Newcore steel, which is my district, and the timber industry, as I mentioned which is also in my district. If this bill were to pass, then there is some thought that the timber industry, and I wouldn't disagree with this, that the timber industry would benefit to some degree. But, in talking with all of the folks at Newcore steel, if this bill were to pass, it's going to hurt the steel industry here in North Carolina. Just a couple of quick facts about Newcore. Newcore is a fortune 500 company that has it's headquarters in Charlotte. While Newcore, their representative in conversations with me, heavily support the timber industry, they do have some problems with this particular piece of legislation. Now the mill in my area employs about 450 people and the mill has recently been expanded and 25 new positions were added. Newcore is a very unique company, they have a no layoff policy. And what that means is even when business is not good, they don't let their employees go, they hang on to them. and these employees in Northeastern North Carolina are averaging $80,0000 a year in income. Now there are few jobs in Northeastern North Carolina that pay those kind of wages I can tell you for sure, none that I'm aware of. Newcore has a couple of other very unique things. One of them is, and for all of you folks that are environmentalists, Newcore is the largest recycler in the United States, the largest recylcer. It is the only steel company left in the United States. We have abandoned steel to the Chinese. But Newcore, because of a lot of the things they have been able to do, including their commitment to use exclusively, almost exclusively 90% recycled material, has found it's niche in the marketplace and they're doing very well. So what we are looking at here is if this bill does not pass, the timber industry is not going to be harmed, they perhaps may not have an advantage that they would gain as a result of this, but they will not be harmed. Think about that. The steel industry, if this bill passes, the steel industry is going to be harmed significantly and the kinds of jobs and this being a fortune 500 company again, headquartered within our state. As much as I admire the two representatives who are sponsoring this bill, I would have to ask you carefully consider these comments before you cast your vote.

I don't think taking one step forward and two steps backward is a good idea when it comes to economics or employment. Good paying jobs are hard to come by, we need to preserve those jobs, and for that reason I will be opposing this bill this evening. Thank you. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Mobley please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To speak on the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The lady is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you Mr. Speaker. As I said to you all last week, Nucor is located within my home county and I want to repeat that I have no qualms or dislike for lumbar because I know the lumbar industry is just as important as the steel industry. However, I know that the steel industry in my county employs a large number of high wage earners and I would not like to see my constituents penalized by loss of jobs or the company for that matter. And based on information that has been provided to me this would be a hindrance for the steel industry. The economy as it is is hurting in other areas and hopefully things are gonna be on an upward swing, but I would encourage you not to support this particular bill because of what it would do to the steel industry with regard to leads. Again, I am not speaking against the lumbar company because I have several of those in my district as well, and I don't want the media or anyone else to go say I was speaking against the lumbar company because I'm not. But I have a responsibility to speak when it's going to cause a problem with any of my companies, and that is why I'm speaking against this bill and ask you t do the same. Vote no. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Elmore please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To speak to the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] In district 94 in Wilkes county we are at about 12% unemployment give or take and we are very excited when we see it move just a tenth of a percentage point less. Our median income has dropped from around $30,000 a year to $28,000 a year. Now my point with that is my county has almost 34,000 acres of timber in it. My county is the largest producer of hardwood saw timber in the state of North Carolina, and because of our unemployment situation in Wilkes county I'll tell you one of the most successful businesses right now is the scrap metal business because my folks are unemployed and they're looking for all the pieces of scrap metal they can find to sell to get $50, $55, $30, and most of that is going to Nucor. Now my point with all of this is, this is a bill that deals with public money and this is the people's house, and we can't stand for a policy that picks winners or losers. Because right now my area is losing in this bill or how it currently is, and this bill helps, and we need all the help we can get in Northwest North Carolina when it comes to employment. I'd appreciate your support and vote for this bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Samuelson please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The lady is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Members last week the bill's sponsor was kind enough to delay third reading so that we could get answers to some of the questions, and so I wanted to give you the answers that I found. I spoke to North Carolina Forestry Association, Warehouser [SP] staff and the bill's sponsor, and so I was gonna address on the questions as I recall them and give you the answers. One question had to do with will this bill make lead ineligible in North Carolina for public projects? The answer is yes. Once this bill passes and becomes law and we just gave it a few extra months, once it passes and becomes law you will not be able...

But there are not I'm the last thing the tuition reimbursement for purposes not mainstream person ?? process of reading and it's not a question for us is best to be menacing for the residents into the house may substitute number two for house bill 269 aldermen the whole President Clinton ?? ?? all of lee's report time was important points in a different setting and Tina sales are now back to bill procession for the debate in my quest for the house is the best time of the house may substitute number 2069 on summary Alderson wallpaper tile reminder for the older the whole president for one ?? ?? who was important ?? city fire department 3619 as a substitute number two in a house built a 69 stresses the timing will be sent as an actor or simply one is records and the night time house money is in the only reasons I'm not allowing development, act one, making certain agents acted in response to define states supreme court time and cost the united Johnson and author on a ?? president carter's recognize the pro-statehood has attacked with 43 1/2 out of the judiciary and a lot of homeless for every dollar-a knowledge of the members end of the time-formed in the haulers birds well and was sees the Hopwood office, estimates for-Primetime for tonight and non-white house's passage of the house may substitute now some of these are on separate aldermen, was the development ?? on display for ?? who was important 108, Fuhrman for that it as a substitute for house bill bases as it reminds action will be rather to consider alternatives as president and not a question for the house passed the house because the substitute of one of these areas are $3.00 a night while president in a sad time a substitute house will not exist as a reading will be sent as an house bill 362 to 4. Two is a city property more timely 60 to 00 and unexpected calls are fine and substance changes relating to the department of all its 89 to 1 thing the support seen driving to criticism of the jobs of all for one person one more PlayStation purpose and say that outline of the ladies in the night of course, as ran on a less bill on a show of pushing real activity was one of one year on: the change will become $100,000-person is there a way station purpose united only does that has made no -based maker of the house bases-seeded on our time, inside the restaurant at his request of armaments that this is having on us time and were , in your driveway of lives of more members and two members of the office all instructions for a Dr. Watson and the one with the doctor's orders for ?? rape discussion, but did not question for the house's passage of the house may substitute house bill 362 on a separate holder, as the number one of the ?? ??....................

Lumber. Strictly, yes we will or we can and that will create more jobs. The idea that we have to send off to Brazil or someplace else, the buyer fluorine is absolutely ludicrous when we have perfectly good fluorine in this state and we can use it. Imagine the bill that Representative Presnell talked about in committee, well lot of us weren’t in committee. But the forestry bill that use bamboo imported from Brazil. How many jobs would we have created if we could have used North Carolina lumber? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Blust, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To see if Representative Brody will yield for a question? [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman yields. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Brody, what could be the difference between a two by four from Brazil and one from North Carolina that would render the Brazilian two by four so much more energy efficient than one from North Carolina? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Probably, I guess if we use the North Carolina diesel fuel to power the ship to bring it over, maybe that’s a plus. But other than that, I’m sorry I can’t answer that question. So, in a way, just I guess to end; let’s put in reality. October 31st comes, building will continue; October 31st comes, we can, we as a state ?? we can strictly request energy efficient, environmentally sound buildings but also what we can do that leed doesn’t provide is we can insist our North Carolina jobs. Thank you. Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Hager, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Guys, you know I come, as everybody knows from a very rural county just like Representative Elmore does. And, I’ve got two places in my county and one of them is ?? as a part of lumber. I met a couple of weeks ago when the subject of Representative Presnell’s bill came up and they definitely told me they employ about 300 people total between them. I have a chip mill where there’s about another 100 folks. They told me that if they can sell more lumber, they would employ more people. They thought this was the key to sell more lumber. Now he made some assumptions here I think that I’m not sure that we all can make. Representative Steinburg said if we don’t do this, then we’ll lose jobs at Nucor. If we don’t do this, we will lose jobs here and there. I think the assumptions made a) If we do this then leed’s gonna leave. There would not gonna be Leed certified bills in North Carolina. I don’t believe that’s true. I think we made a bigger assumption here that if we do this then this bill just won’t get built that we’re talking about. The ?? bill would not have got billed if we didn’t have Leed certification. I don’t think that’s right. I think these bills would still get billed just like Representative Brody talked about. I think we’ll still move forward. And guess what, we’ll probably use North Carolina lumber in them. Well, I don’t see anything coming from this other than good things for the lumber business and those of you from rural counties like I am, you probably have a lumber mill. You probably know somebody that owns a lumber truck. You probably know somebody who owns a skitter and if you’re from rural county, you probably know what a skitter is. So, I ask you please if you want jobs in rural counties and I tell you what my lumber folks are telling me. They’re saying this is good for their jobs, this is good for their bottom line. So please vote yes on the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative McElraft, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The lady is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Members, it’s time to take a stand. We’ve been writing letters, we’ve been asking the Leed certification people for a long time to look at North Carolina lumber. And so look at our certifiers and our sustainability. If you research the leed, you’re talking about horse drawn; pulling wood out of some of these areas with horse drawn shackles or whatever. Now that’s ridiculous. We have sustainability here in our North Carolina forest and we have grey certifiers to prove that and we need to take a stand like the other states are doing right now. It’s time to do it. Nucor also ships out of my port and we need those jobs there too and I’ll tell you that we need to stand together as a state. Nucor, the concrete people and the forestry industry and do what’s right for our entire state. Nucor, you’ve already said has a monopoly on steel. Do you think we’re not gonna continue to build steel buildings in this state. Of course we.

are raised me find time to revisit this and did not hear the data certifications in Amman-one and one for army-navy and marine lighting designer holdings instantaneous and me about this deal person is a PlayStation purpose everything but the downtrodden Azevedo times fragments of a house ad that in one of thing is the most important five and made the only five hits for $7.00 for the ?? packages of North Carolina forestry industry as an incentive package that for many years as individually practiced a package will continue in Iran arms deal as a pianist and ?? person is innocent mistake for the purpose in a defender who is representing estimate does minutes into pages-enzyme and idea and a password of the North Carolina lumber in writing and North Carolina chamber that Ranieri 1000 the forest and 16 times are in the person at the station purpose servers this time your questions and somber as john doe U.S. representative of the southern U.S. as a matter of monetary fund is used a solid state trial of repository of the 13-60 dollars for the office of the vehicles and reaches an admissions and ?? ress and Intel was up as a systems-and-spend the MSN said that I mentioned this to happen, show-and- a-timers, the issue, send letters to-head of the issue, and our finances of the information-time-off so- accounts and does recognize and riled high-speed of light snow of thing this nation has an outstanding year-old and jobs and mechanisms for acting times in different numbers are only just respond person as the PlayStation purpose is to become the place that doesn't know anything that might happen if I had found some time until the state capitol building of a sudden 599 and now is undercutting his NAZI designer to the discretion of the activities that back-to 22 14th and as the answer is not going to happen after that time when of the things that's the thinking is after ingesting but I think there's been a 19 year in the real causes this dollar and 70¢ an hour and a standard way station purpose times-speed, the first-place because there hasn't been dozens second son, his friend Simon and one of the other centers that john doe-of-a-listers tiles to the just-Saturday, when the times have a Cheyenne manufacturer that finance sites send definition of ensure that they have the high end of an invasion of this chat and I'm a hot as much as some national and the hand of the steel industry, states and so the subjects that they have an opportunity that Spanish that it-to-door to each of the times of India writer in studio and the state's international presence of the fact that the event of the innocent aid of life and ?? that stuff that has been searching and the steel industry that of the standardization and a definitive evidence I have the answer ?? ?? ……………….

him, he's not the smell, but we're going to be voting on is going to eliminate that advantage and will not have to worry about having a monopoly because we won't have a single industry. it's that simple. thank you [SPEAKER CHANGES] Rosanna Motley police departments speak on the bill. the second time related recognized a big nose in it a second time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] thank you, Mister Speaker, I've been listening and am still of the impression that somebody thinks that were opposing the lumber business is not so as I said to you before I have lumber companies and within my district more than one is one in Hartford County. just as Nucoris in Hertfordshire. there are others who will be possibly affected other companies. some of them are Columbia Forest products train and green fiber electric logs standard black and Decker have a lot of rhetoric mixing. that's another company that's in my district. the three that I have mentioned CNET company. the lumber company and Nucor. all three are located in Hertfordshire around the state of North Carolina. we're talking about four thousand eight hundred days accredited North Carolina professionals, and it does not make sense to me and you are talking about striving fighting economy that we are currently we don't need to be possibly losing jobs. we need to cut it out of the brain and job so I ask you to follow the lead of the representatives were asking you to vote against this bill. thank you [SPEAKER CHANGES] the discussion question for analysis passage of the house. three substituted hospital, six twenty eight, as amended, on its third reading on paper, but I'll is the" part one zero four, the Senate and voted affirmative and forty three to negative out to be substituted to hospital, six twenty eight, as amended, has passed its third reading ability engrossed in sense of the Senate, the speaker presented more. please take your purpose must pertain to my scalp. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The Job readiness state 's motion, Michigan. house Bill sixty short title is transferred many cultural centre miserably from the committee is removed from the calendar for May fifteenth encountered for tomorrow without objection, so what revs immigrated was that your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mister Speaker, on my men, mistaken voted no. one personal amendment to House Bill six twenty eight and if I could be recorded as voting yes and I having a bad night. I guess I also have not shown is voting on House Bill five sixty seven, despite the fact that I'm sitting here and that should be yes. also the memory party is learning IR five sixty seven, and on the amendment to support by Rosen of Fresno to Houston, six twenty eight Rosetta Baskerville, please let your purpose to correct a millionaire a mistake and gentlemen that placed a drink ring on five sixty seven hello is just a knee-jerk reaction of Chris Ray and let him into prison green on five sixty seven the speaker 's memory records that are noted speaker representative and simply state her purpose had likely be recorded as high on House Bill five twenty six. a lady records have a better die on house oh five, twenty six thousand twenty six, article writing

Committee Substitute for House Bill 26, a bill to be entitled an act, to strengthen the laws protecting against the theft of vehicles, or disassembly and resale of parts and to assist law enforcement in the investigation of organized criminal activity associated with the theft of vehicles, the General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Moore, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] If I may, first of all to send forth an amendment, please. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to send forth an amendment. The Clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Moore moves to amend the bill on page two, line one, by rewriting the line to read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Members, this amendment was requested by the folks in the metal recycling business which I see what probably could include new [unintelligible] so I--and I support--I'm sending forth this amendment. This--what this would do--is reduce--my bill originally would have expanded the time period for which you had to have a title--twenty years we dialed it back to twelve so now we've dialed it back to ten which is what the current law is. But the reason we're doing that is-- one, we're still trying to get all the stakeholders at the table move the bill on; secondly, we--we've got all the other good things in the bill I think are are gonna [sic] help address the problems, so I would encourage the members to support the amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion. Representative Jordan, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] I--I don't have the amendment on my-- [SPEAKER CHANGES] The House be at ease. [pause] Any other members not able to access the amendment on the dashboard? [pause] Any other member requiring a copy of the amendment? The House be at ease. The Chair is advised by the Clerk that it is available on the dashboard, so if we can hold a moment in case there is a delay in the system response [pause]. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Daughtry, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Could I ask a question of the bill sponsor? [SPEAKER CHANGES] I yield. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Moore yields. [SPEAKER CHANGES] I've got a couple of telephone calls from, I guess they're car crushers, I don't know what; in my district. Do they support this amendment? [SPEAKER CHANGES] They like this amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] That's why I [??] ran. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Members able to get access to the amendment? Raise your hand if you do not have access. [pause] All other members except Representative Speciale, Representative Pittman have access? Representative Richardson? We're gonna [sic] temporarily displace this bill and come back. House Bill 74, the Clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee Substitute for House Bill 74, a bill to be entitled an act, to provide for the periodic review and expiration of rules the General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Murry, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Ladies and gentlemen, cutting red tape for small business is jobs. This is a jobs bill because it starts the process to review the twenty-three thousand regulations that are on the books in the state of North Carolina. House Bill 74 establishes a three tiered process for the periodic review of existing rules. The Rules Review Commission is directed to establish a schedule for this review and if an agency fails to conduct the review by the date set in the schedule, the rule will automatically expire. The first step in the process is the agency to conduct analysis of each rule as adopted at least once every ten years, and make an initial determination concerning the rule. The three determinations that the agency can make is necessary with substantive public interest, meaning that the agency has received public comment objecting to the rule within the past two years. The agency can determine that the rule is necessary without substantive public interest, meaning that the agency has not received public comment objecting to the rule within the past two years. Or, the agency can identify the rule as unnecessary, meaning that the rule is obsolete, redundant, or otherwise not needed. The second step in the process: the Rules Review Commission must report and determine whether public comments have merit, and if a public comment has merit, then the rule will go through to see whether there is statutory authority for the rule. If public comment relates to the rule and the agency is determined to be without substantive public interest, or unnecessary and the Rules Review Commission finds that the public comment has merit, then the Rules [end of data...]

to show his emails and substantive hold interest and in the roles of the commission will prepare the final term as I'm sitting there is recommendations that there is having the process is about termination as an entity, this latest raiders interrupts of this activity timing for its being one really was a decent, hardworking beginner of the volunteered with administrative procedures oversight committee is at least as exciting as it sounds ?? extermination educator for video, is reviewed outside the body of the day advance of the sixties was enough for the consultation is the navy says, are not affected on the 60% I'm still a second phase of the station for an easy to read to use the review process for time has been unnecessary eighties of the offer as the rules of the message is subject to review all purposes subject are able to view under the section Headings, filed on behalf of the bodies of those offers another person is a dozen members and drive of shooting a 78 is one of many did it for a database on this legislation of 8440, in all be glad to answer any questions and dryer the opposition purpose since the does recognize that the hottest hitter, and that's what they did not find this offers from AA of the senses times of the we were sent here to pass on Monday, as surveys may delay and time again that was reset and as good as process of making sure we have sizable regulations on businesses have command of the personalization purpose data do is recognize tomato-Cisneros, house and wants in on time the fast as the sisters down the 10-letter silver citadel in Sydney, not the central and incredibly long as restructuring in the state, and created their own Wells in a very honored as half a dozen at one time even what happened on a Novell and the mail Saturday after scanning-answering a substance wasn't quite concerned about as much as issues relating to the public of the same time they're in a non-in-line item and expected interest to all his agency time and as every year since budget constraints and insert about the possible in this recession time sat, singing and savor his roles, com and a sensor to an end-all phrase seems to me, and morals, high-wire glass in 19700001 hand, I'm using other than as a cyanide was not about having their concern, fastest Sesser in west commons back to the sun August and as common sense, and inspiration of roles and down I spent time else was expecting an examination session, when comedy starring roles, and then bill's sponsors a share of the business unit of the second sentence of the network anything for an enormous center, building for insulating cleaner and more protections under no consideration someone on committee and the time person subway station purpose of the mail by a second has made no changes to senior at inference airing of the infected and Stockdale time until house is an idyllic of these in the straightaway center also plans to call us and ask , wonderful series is going to be written in one of the] time the easy at all of the game as tender all season on fine in IE time periods and he was in Regionals and find a Creole rules 99 at will not be detected in fact that wouldn't affect access to services and other drive the lane and it was the point series is on the person is in some way station purpose and l.a.'s recognize that no man at his rallies in Santa Ana, Green stein company at work in other time since 1910 -3 things process all settings that we're ?? ??..............

legislators will have some input in it. And so, as we go through the process of filtering out the bills that are necessary, the bills that are maybe necessary but have some complications to it, or the bills that are not necessary, we're going to have a chance to look back over them as a body, and so I urge your support of the bill we've worked hard on and I think it works. And to Representative Harrison's comment, yes, there are a few little tweaks that we will be looking at when it goes over to the Senate to make sure it actually functions the way it needs to. When you're creating a new process, sometimes you have to make sure that all the pieces are working the way you intended them to. I urge your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Larry Hall, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To speak on the bill, Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I just noticed on page three, step three, the procedure for the final determination report that shall become effective once they have consulted with the overall committee. And this you may recognize if you read this step, you'll recognize it from the transportation bill. And the problem I have with this is the same problem I had with the procedure in the transportation bill. What happens is the report comes back, the committee has a specified period of time within which to meet. Apparently the committee chair is the only person who can call that committee to have a meeting. If the meeting is not held within the period of time, the report is deemed accepted and everything goes on. So any review that you thought or intended to happen at that third step, and that was supposed to be a critical part of the rule making process, that review is then lost. So I'm concerned, and I hope it will be fixed before it goes across to the Senate or someone addresses the fact that it does not provide additional time or mechanism for an extensive time to be given. If they do not meet within 60 days, then it is deemed to be accepted and satisfied. So again, I hope that someone will look at that and get that corrected. I hope that's not the intention. I hope the intention at step three was in fact to have that review done and not have it be automatic or happen unintentionally because someone failed to call the committee meeting or the chair of the committee personally liked the report and did not want anyone else to have input on it. So I'll be voting against the bill as it appears, and I hope whoever is going to ensure that it's correct will ensure that step three in fact is effective. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate? If not the question before the House is the passage of the House committee substitute to House Bill 74 on its second reading. All in favor vote aye, all opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. All members wishing to record please do so at this time. Representative Blust. The clerk will let the machine record the vote. 90 having voted in the affirmative, 24 in the negative, the House committee substitute for House Bill 74 has passed its second reading and without objection will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] General Assembly of North Carolina, enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate? If not the question before the House is the passage of the House commitee substitute to House Bill 74 on its third reading. All in favor say aye. All opposed say no. The ayes have it. The House committee substitute to House Bill 74 has passed its third reading and will be sent to the Senate. Ladies and gentlemen, we're going to go back and see if all the memebers will have the amendment.... Back to House Bill 26, we temporarily displaced it, but at the time we displaced it the amendment was properly before us. Any member going to the dashboard wishing to read the amendment before we take the vote on the amendment? Any member here not able to get access to the amendment at this time? Further discussion, further debate on the amendment? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the amendment sent forth by Representative Tim Moore to the House committee substitute to House Bill 26. All in favor vote aye, all opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will let the machine record the vote. 114 having voted in the affirmative and none in the negative, the amendment has passed. We're back on the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Moore, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill as amended. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Members, what this bill does is this bill seeks to achieve a balance between the law enforcement side of trying to make sure there's paperwork, documentation, ease in proving the case of vehicle theft. This bill was brought about by what's becoming more and more of a common crime where folks....

Times of the times of the symptoms of error if a machine itself for shrimp industry, more about the spillage are requesting time Indians at the front wheel again as well as network anyone with action rations for chants of you in the hands of the car forced disinclined to the cause of a year's time for an insert the many fences, on average, shrines and one of the ones who was really a central database of information available when the end of the plot and in real time that the Showtime a state office mail has hired by the support is billed as the source for live in a national database is the movie, Mendocino and that sort of a year of South Carolina league as in time as one of the one great thing for the smell of the nomination the course of study that we were reported, of consensus times and the military zone when users senate in the one-bashing concerts take over the commission about business was one for Shimon of 7/2 this person to replace aging purpose segment of the affected us and all is betting lines of text of entertainment is what we actually sat August last year were one of the times of a deal is made to the status of the White House, becoming forced North Carolina coming, and states whereas we find that the monetary is that they would seem that would allow any reason for some Swiss agent was the number of the timing have been reported Nolte years and under its easy to get a question and on the street is that every case in point person was the practice session for that ?? is not a question before the house passed the house may substitute 1026 is in a separate all in one of those men and women ?? who was important 114 and a different aspect of the house began to the house bill 36 months has a second reading about section will be rather, Johnson will conduct business in front of it is not a question for the house passed the house may substitute 1026 times and the other side of policy, the set as a substitute house bill 26 minutes past is a real been present for the 700094. Times in the house bill that would give me, that make the bill collectors to the john Stockton’s expected about the second reason Johnson called on at personalized ?? is done with your ms and 1/2-acre members of the house has truly is a technical time all the elements from the general staff and commission which is primarily that was on law professor from various homes lost his rams that it's time for Seattle section one-for measures to the final quarter of section 10 exchange and reference section break and forum section I'll say it's correct a fight about all her eccentric several adult video that there is an amendment on completing his wand and us one time-members please do not be influenced appliances and all of this contest for setting up the knights and to all-white person at the state about this time in the country as important a courtly message about used in the bill makes 113 by the body lying to me that was the highest-this is a major question that, the station is simply out is about time the report 011 hold use in and no real idea force this year or processed and a lot of things not a question for the house's passage innocent for the reservoir as a substitute house money to alderman of time listening for women who was important time for GM and the firmament, died in the middle class is one of the total for the discussion and debate on the bill has not ?? ?? ??.............

chime and-White House as to how the system has won nine twos an unsavory alderman of all is said and women ?? others wishing to report places as a chime was important 139-100 house may substitute government is not as presently times of all the readers of Johnson dollar line of business credit is not a question for the house's passage of the house may substitute announcement is made as a real times an hour while president us as a substitute a small-business has a rebuilding presence of some of these ?? ?? ?? ?? -the times and Canada, reaching down shares at San Jose, of contents, Shangri-year later shipped from the files and riding generation ?? ?? 13 years for Utah Hospital-event will be at 7:00 PM June and a lot of a dollar dollar ?? in that sense, that the optimal and riley's to former associate of times and the rest means that the convention and jet was recognized as much as house bill 364, five, say the changes made the event, the committee of the creation of the end of the five-a- led judge in one of his house bill 364 short-sighted, the accountability of the state and the views of the most visually of the operation of the neighborhood of the operations in, for National Service station managers ?? on edition house bill one us to 84 short, the head of a commission to our school, they sent me the Sierra club and the vision of the second Rogers and one additional house to a 16-and the medicine and Sunday after-the-as-optional service time managers ?? ?? as he knows-how to have these added 1981 to be contacted by the times and this is a person is used here is the base was walking down the retained by callers here for time is a few years Johnson of all products , from a 49% of women will be recognized in NATO and the timer, just know what's the name of the house administrator Hinson, commissioners parts of court ?? ??...

down, they said they believe the system seven and 5¢ the courts will be required to keep a listing of these times of sizzle severity of the city's action and therefore no information, Thailand and his players now the top of the the clippers 90,000 specimens race specific events, all information ?? vision to support the discussion, the timeout question for the house of message of house bill the house basis to the hospital to a 1.7 rating on-one analyst says that meant for more than one ?? ?? is a vicious, different ??'s garden with john 41 percent more than $110 and 88, and then for the date and time house in the substitute for house bill two anyone is past its second reading and or not to mention the Rev. Ronald Johnson about the London discussion that is no question for the time his message of house bill 281 house basis to house bill to the wants of the office of mayor said, president now spearheaded the out and the mismatched and reception center house joint resolution for a 70 for every half-3745 and was in all its patent applications, Johnson May have that made during the session out the papas in a sense of having to call a convention percent of the continental, United States constitution for purpose of closing one importance to the prosecution of the demonstrators was visited the signing an incorrect in back copies of them this resolution the style to suppress all actors Johnson will provide events of the java fractures and Jordan’s recognized to divide the fight is bigger classy times a day for this resolution of live action by the republican primary sponsors won the democratic primary sponsor a democratic a sponsors and 24 driving and sponsors including a profit, Florida residents is the deadline for his installation this data, it's usually the U.S. constitution provides the NASDAQ of the phenomenon on tile is 1027, 79, history which is known as set forth by two cars and houses and said the state student from 134 he otherwise never been used as part of the time that has played solid round the clock or series, $17.00 pressure of idea at the time to shoot what he can easily become our web-page one state-guess the constitution and ethically and morally stations and individual rest of the AFL CIO lady last time this is hardly over an hour-onstage from president of the event that makes it easy on access points of the convention 2010 under ideal eyes includes drier division actions of foreign wars national rifle association from our society time on and off the air pollution among others fine-particle five was the first couple conditions is pays more than a reception for any amendments proposed riled effectively as editor of the rest of the house into throwing the field is wide, and it is time-and-comer running condition fable of the only major party U.S. constitution into a completely different times of India, Asia, and is free , states require 555 ?? ?? ??.......................

Chinese history for societies are the start of the states of mind for the station commission on the creation of the state's 50 members and all their house the time of mind and body lies, and call for a decision about standing calls his wife of this resolution maker ?? all his resolution has changed act as previous calls for constitution ?? may not stay on as importers of India’s body is nothing more nothing less than hired as to how the time the 7480 possessions that event is not a question for the house is message about time in 374173 12 cent bill when I'm as president of the carport and ?? ?? who want to see an apartment, and somebody in the affirmative and that the house joint resolution 374 minutes past site every time that section will be rather, office of the second coming discussion and that is not a question for the house is the best posture is Lucien timing for mystery authors of a percent, was that he has had a measure of inflation is less than we send jitters and ?? car hospital for 77 for only the time the White House bills in a separate building, act of war in center has applied over the right into the sea Lions make more use of the U.S. trucking divide Ryland person is committing acts of domestic violence and replied that all the department of public safety to report on implementation and cost impact ?? Johnson author of the facts to a different persona is represented many of these 489 student about as speaker it was being a vehicle, or a ?? thousands of party unity for another day in the county office of the wizards like a school's times bigger day, the house and I do this year alliance restraint, that is true for as many as 4000 ?? she recently, were fearful of the day the coroner's trade war against him that may call morning he violated that were encouraged to the house and three small ?? rein slayer and how some time periods, unite in 19 1000 Allies as the ones that happen from time to call him away from the ?? rein S is to be announced that the granddaddy of all time for the region until light was taken from her ?? as the buses and actual prices only the national coalition against domestic violence in the nonsense of the United States envisions longer be the best buses and we call the department Thailand classes and the Kings, the U.S. would remain higher dollar has been for boyfriends is estimated 85% and has announced an alarm in the advocates in what areas, the seriousness of your life, it was any 57 era is reported as of this time of five shares of you hear them the benefit of others that without renouncing that the defense side-to-business and his wife and ?? be solely as a sign that matter, sweet and if all it is state based on the same as a deviant 1000 times and dates and some are also on the four cities that were 5 to 10 times in the heart of the last CD is tracking reason to restrain or GPS Technology is afraid of all time raised and is often these will the technology with more on for some innovative members and the doll eight starters immediately house bill four cities ever see Pringle for the serenade has endorsed by the sheriff's association and one for ages of various domestic box alliances a time the city of Izmir Judaism letters one together 20 others in health ?? ?? ………..

Written by Allison's oldest son, Ben, who was a witness to this horrible event, I will share with you the letter to Speaker Tillis from Ben. Dear House Speaker Tillis, I'm Allison's oldest son. She was murdered in December 2009. Even though the restraining order in place, Corey still broke into the house and murdered my mom with my brother, sister, and I in the house. The Allison Act could help prevent endangered women from dangerous men at no cost to them. This could have saved my mom's life and all the pain my family has had to go through. Allison was a very hard working person, never liked to be wrong, but would never back down from a challenge. Everyone knew her for her sense of humor. She raised my brother, sister, and me in a church and preached that nothing was more important than education and God. Thank you Speaker Tillis, Ben. Mr Speaker I yield to Representative Deborah Wallace who has a friendly amendment to add to this bill, [SPEAKER CHANGES] For what purpose does the lady from Wade County Representative Ross rise? [SPEAKER CHANGES]To send forward an amendment [SPEAKER CHANGES]The lady may send forward an amendment, the clerk will read [SPEAKER CHANGES]Representative Deborah Ross must amend the bill on page one line 26 by rewriting that line to read [SPEAKER CHANGES]The lady is recognized to explain the amendment [SPEAKER CHANGES] Ladies and gentlemen this amendment simply adds consultation with the North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence in assessing the GPS system so both the sheriff association and the domestic violence community will be involved in looking at the system and I commend the amendment to you [SPEAKER CHANGES]For the discussion for the debate on the amendment , if not, the question for the House is the amendment sent forward by Representative Ross. All those in favor will vote Aye, All those opposed will vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 114 votes in the affirmative and none in the negative. The amendment sent forward by Representative Ross has been adopted. Further discussion, further debate on the bill. If not, Representative from Meclenberg, Ms Schaffer is recognized, [SPEAKER CHANGES] I simply like to speak on the bill [SPEAKER CHANGES]The lady is recognized [SPEAKER CHANGES]Representative ?? has spoken to the ?? portion of the bill. I simply wanted to say I did not have the opportunity to know Allison but over the last few years I did have the great privilege of knowing Allison's sister April and April's husband Josh and their children. I've also gotten the chance to know Allison's two youngest children who April and Josh are now raising. I just simply wanted to say this is a great bill, it's another tool for our judges and our public safety officials to be able to use to protect women in this kind of situation and that really adds to a trend of some things that we've been doing in the ?? assembly of this session and really giving these tools to protect children. We've seen that in Carla's law and Kaylee's Law.Then also these victims of domestic violence. I did have the opportunity to meet Allison's mother a few weeks ago and she said to me just thank you so much for what you're doing in trying to get this bill passed. I know that nothing can bring Allison back but please do whatever you can to prevent another mother from having to go through this. I believe this is a good bill, good public policy and I urge your support, [SPEAKER CHANGES]For the discussion for the debate, if not the question for the house is the passage of house bill 477 as amended on the second reading. All those in favor will vote Aye, all those opposed will vote No. The clerk will open the vote. Clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 114 having voted in the affirmative and none in the negative. House bill 477 as amended has passed it's second reading and will be read a third time, [SPEAKER CHANGES] ?? [SPEAKER CHANGES]For the discussion for the debate, if not the question for the house is the passage of house bill 477 as amended on it's third reading. All those in favor say Aye [multiple speakers] Aye [SPEAKER CHANGES] opposed no. ?? have it. The bill will be engrossed and sent to the Senate.

in the state more of this is definitely $1.00 and more information just announced a student in-house to a 54 portions of the pstn Parcel Service as that of the women from the day of the times of the owners that they are dashed so ?? house bill, 93 before RE ?? incentive for house bill 103 until the final act requirements for needs to maintain regular office hours Johnson of time on box $200,000 and up. It's recognized in the paper the time he was fired this is a compromise bill again about whether it will each timers some friendly is supported, about the section one, more is better than by account information source-verified riled on the display at a cost the county close major someone in several states: one time or five years includes course for tech liars what 1/2 years in may at the La Jolla spared by a slash the plate and the papers on record once the packers are recorded his first one property is read, and they got rid of these options: he became the wall when you get a call close and has grown from some of the times is sectors that has our relationship where the question and call out the recall it may have been missed this requires an office-only a year-long range and Ryan Vinson said, can't stop the house and custom of the widest and as the high court to get a life of the signers than one-operations or reschedule the possession for the event is not a question for the suspect and a possible 593 and secondly time all-the homes was one of the one ?? for one of the sheet and whether times higher than 85 into that in the hospital five, three as fast as second reading and without objection was part of Johnson of all felony and for the session timeout in the question for the house is passage of the house bill Mott, Israel is studying on times to almost-segment in a sadder ?? and house bills-as-which suffers some hospitals 625 were RE house bill 6.1 and only 50 and activating and sorting provisions for temporary Health Care structures Johnson of time in hours, down from the Patterson profit is recognized by the auto industry that that is the house for those of you that when the session is the same exact available, as intensely and 2000 out of the season by the simple as for the placement of separate healthcare structures and Ms.Mazzola times, saying that the heroine is one-act as a city with a map of the Israelis have installed the system of industry as well as the decibel is the size of houses for a discussion of the time and not the question for the house is the passage of house bill 625 points separating all-but when of this business, and whether ?? person, China and that either team had an idea, that they're the house has house bill 625.7 rating and I'll ?? ??...............

without objection will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] General Assembly of North Carolina NX. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion for the debate? If not, the question for the House is the passage of House Bill 625 on its third reading. All those in favor will say aye. All those opposed will say no. The aye’s have it and the House has passed House Bill 625 on being sent to the Senate. House Bill 629, the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee Substitute for House Bill 629. A bill’s been titled asked to amend the definition of a Special Purpose Project to include agricultural and forestry waste disposal facilities. General assembly of North Carolina NX. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Wilson County, Representative Martin, is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I provided all the members with some background information on this. It went through full Commerce Committee and full Finance Committee with unanimous support and uniquely I got emails from Representative Collins and Representative Deborah Ross about what a great bill it was. It has the support of the Treasurer’s Office Deemer. I have a letter from Commissioner of Agriculture and the Secretary of Commerce. This is a good jobs bill. It is a simple clarifying change to include agriculture and forestry waste in a list of industries that qualify for local government commission to issue tax exempt bonds. It does not obligate the state in anyway. It has zero fiscal impact. I’m happy to answer any questions that will support the wood pellet industry and I urge your support. Thank you. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion for the debate? If not, the question for the House is the passage of House Bill 29 on its second reading. All those in favor will vote aye. All those opposed will vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 111 having voted in the affirmative and 2 in the negative. The House has passed on its second reading House Bill 629. Without objection it will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] General Assembly of North Carolina NX. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Discussion and debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of House Bill 629 on its third reading. All those in favor will say aye. All those opposed will say no. The aye’s have it. The House has passed House Bill 629 on its third reading. It will be sent to the Senate. Representative Collins for what purpose? House Bill 664. The clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee Substitute for House Bill 664. Bill’s been titled and asked to facilitate the deployment of mobile broadband and other enhanced wireless communication services by streamlining the process used by state agencies and local governments to approve the placement of wireless facilities in their jurisdictions. General Assembly of North Carolina NX. [SPEAKER CHANGES] For what purpose does the gentleman from Cumberland County, Representative Lucas, wish to be recognized? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Wish to request excuse from motive because of Rule 24.1A. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Noted. Gentleman from Rutherford County, Representative Hager, is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. House bill 664 provides modifications to the regulation and construction modification of wireless and broadband facilities. What this bill does is removes the patchwork of laws and regulations we have across this state, but still maintaining the safety, land use and zoning of the local folks. It looks at building new wireless broadband and wireless facilities in urban and rural areas. This bill make it easier and a lot more cost effective to get broadband and wireless in your area, especially the rural areas where Representative Alexander said in Committee also the urban areas. So, I ask for your support for the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion for the debate? If not, the question for the House is the passage

To pass Bill 664 on it's second reading. All those in favor will vote "aye'. All those opposed will vote "no". The clerk will open the vote. Representative Stam, Representative Malone. Clerk will lock the machine and record the votes. 108 having voted in the affirmative and 4 in the negative. House Bill 664 has passed its second reading and without objection will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Further discussion, further debate. If not, the question for the house is the passage of House Bill 664 on its third reading. All those in favor will say "aye". All those opposed will say "no". The aye's have it and House Bill 664 has passed it's third reading and will be sent to the Senate. House Bill 675 the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Committee substitute for House Bill 675 a Bill to be entitled An Act Commending Laws Pertaining to the Regulation of Pharmacy Technicians, Pharmacy Audits, and Prescriptions of Schedule II Substances. General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Gentleman, from Wake County, Representative Murray is recognized to debate the Bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Thank you Mr. Chairman. This Bill has five sections in it. Sections 1 and 2 deal with pharmacy technicians. Sections 3 and 4 deal with pharmacy audits and Section 5 deals with Schedule II medications. I will start with Section 5, Schedule II medications are the highest controlled substance in DEA law that includes Percocet, Adderall, and Oxycontin. It's the highest likelihood of abuse. Representative Martin brought it to my attention that in North Carolina we do not have an expiration date for the written hard-copy prescriptions for Schedule II medications. Whereas Schedules III's and IV's, Valium, Hydrocodone, Vicodin, they expire six months from the date written, and so this would add an expiration date to Schedule II medications only. You have to have a hard copy prescription every time you get that prescription filled. There are no refills for Schedule II medications. So this just adds an expiration date. Going back to up to Section 1 and 2, currently in North Carolina law, if you want to be a pharmacy technician and work alongside a pharmacist, before you can register with the Board of Pharmacy you have to have a job. And so this would allow for certified pharmacy technicians to be able to register with the Board of Pharmacy, get trained, and then go get a job but it adds another pathway for pharmacy technicians to be registered in our State. Additionally, Sections 3 and 4 deal with pharmacy audits and to make sure that should an audit occur at a pharmacy and the insurance company have to do a recoupment that the only portion that is an error. I'll use an example as this is a very common error where a pharmacist would bill for thirty pills but the prescription was written for three, so I typed thirty and then the insurance company pays me, they figure out the error, and they come back and take all thirty pills back when I actually did dispense the three, and so this helps the situation to make sure that you only get recouped what was actually dispensed in error. Those are the five sections of the Bill. With that, Mr. Chair, I would like to send forth an amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Gentleman is recognized to send forward an amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Representative Murray moves to amend the Bill on Page 4, Line 12 by adding at the end of that line after the phrase 2013 the following sentence. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Gentleman is recognized to explain his amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: This just makes sure that the effective date of October 1, 2013 that this law applies to pharmacy technicians registered after that date and for audits that occur after that date. We just wanted to make sure that this is clearly applies from this date forward so that people can't get deemed for activities prior to the legislation being passed. This was recommended by staff. As a technical correction, I would ask that you support the amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Further discussion and debate on the amendment. If not, the question for the House is the amendment set forward by Representative Murray. All those in favor will vote "aye".

All those opposed will vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 114 having voted in the affirmative and none in the negative. The House has agreed to the amendment sent forth by Representative Murry. Further discussion, further debate. If not, the question before the House is the passage of House bill 675 as amended on its second reading. All those in favor will vote aye. All those opposed will vote no. Clerk will open the vote. Representative Ramsey. Representative Brandon. The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 114 having voted in the affirmative. And none in the negative. Without objection the bill will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] For what purpose does the gentleman from Durham Representative Luebke rise? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative, Luebke, Luebke you wish to be recognized? If not the question before the House is the passage of House bill 675 as amended on its third reading. All those in favor will say aye. All those opposed will say no. The ayes have it. The House has passed House bill 675. It will be engrossed and sent to the Senate. House bill 677. The clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] House bill 677 a bill to be entitled and enacted providing for the local government regulatory reform act. General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] For what purpose does the gentleman from Mecklenburg Representative Brawley rise? [SPEAKER CHANGES] To explain the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Gentleman is recognized. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you Mr. Speaker. I was chairman of the regulatory reform subcommittee on local government and opened a bill that was to be an omnibus bill and collected several ideas. And two of them actually I’m bringing forward today. One is, these are only related to cities and counties. In one there is a restriction on dues check-offs for union’s collective bargaining units. Cities and counties are not allowed under North Carolina law to collectively bargain. Some of them are checking off dues. And actually they feel a little pressure to deal with their citiz, with the citizens of theirs that are members of unions. There are costs involved with this. And the purpose of this part of the bill is simply to remove that as an option. So it’s our fault not the city councils’ fault. The second one was a complaint that didn’t come from a city but actually came from some companies. There are some local governments that are considering instituting regulation of the carbon footprint of corporate employees and will require companies to register, put in plans to reduce the carbon footprint of their employees with fees for participation and fines for none attainment. And while we recognize the value of reducing carbon footprint I don’t believe that cities and counties are actually charged with that authority. So they may run a voluntary program but cannot run a compulsory one and require fines for noncompliance. I was asked in committee if the dues check-off bill would apply to school teachers. It would not. Boards of education are not mentioned in this bill and they are I believe state employees. Thank you Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGES] For what purpose does the gentleman from Wake county Representative Hall rise? [SPEAKER CHANGES] I speak on the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Gentleman is recognized. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Members of ?? this is another example of us here in Raleigh telling local communities what they can and can’t do. This time we’re telling both cities and counties that regardless of what people, what local people want that they can’t pass local ordinances that our Federal Government has already told us is okay to do. This time we’re telling local communities that they can’t authorize or even allow payroll deductions. And the problem with that other than us forcing our, our will on local communities is that right to work the courts have already said specifically does not prohibit union deductions. More specifically the courts told us that we shouldn’t pick and choose. We already allow deductions

For charities like United Way, we've allowed deductions for teachers, for State employees, so I would urge the members here to be consistent in the ways we decide on what we tell local communities to do. Specifically, if you agree that we should be telling them. I hope you'll vote against this Bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: For what purpose is the gentleman from Cumberland County Representative Glazier rise: [SPEAKER CHANGES]: To debate the Bill Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: The gentleman is recognized. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Thank you very much Mr. Speaker. I rise in opposition to the Bill for a variety of reasons. The first reason was, I think, eloquently stated by my colleague, Representative Hall. There may be some local communities that feel a pressure to do this and they, of course, have to take responsibility and decide for themselves but there may be local communities who do this or want to and now we're telling them no, and I don't think it's our responsibility when it's not a constitutional issue to be barring and taking over and micro managing what counties and cities can and can't do. They have a right to their own decisions and the political consequences of them and they have a right to make mistakes and to fail and to pick themselves up and try something new or try something again. I believe in local control fundamentally and this Bill for no reason other than a pure policy decision that we want takes that away from them and I don't think that's sufficient. But that's in a sense the minor reason for me voting against the Bill. The bigger reason is I think both, particularly the labor provision, is fundamentally unconstitutional. We went through this exact argument when we cut off the NCAE dues last year and I stood on heh floor and argued that there would be a lawsuit, that it violated equal protection, due process, Bills of Attainder, and sure enough there was a lawsuit. The Wake County Superior Court found on multiple grounds that it should be struck and we are doing the exact same thing here. We do not have the constitutional authority to say to one group that you may have dues collected by the government but another group cannot. Either we're gonna say nobody has that right, which may or not be sufficient, but at least it's consistent or we don't get involved in it, but we don't get to pick because we don't like labor unions or we don't like NCAE, whether they can or can't do it. The Constitution just doesn't allow that. This will inevitably lead to a lawsuit, it will succeed. We know that because it happened to us the last time we did this exact same thing, and I don't know why we want to persist in this path. On top of which, this is beyond that, because this may have a labor preemption issue under Labor Relations Act. And so, not only do we have the constitutional issues of equal protection and due process and Bills of Attainder just like we did last time, we now have a preemption issue on top of a local control issue. For all kinds of reasons, I think this is just a bad way to go. We ought not be involved in it. We know what the result is going to be here and we ought not be doing this, and so I'm going to be voting "no" and encouraging all my colleagues to do the same. Thank you. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: For what purpose is the gentleman from Durham Representative Luebke rise? [SPEAKER CHANGES]: To speak on the Bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Gentleman is recognized. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Thank you Mr. Speaker and Members of the House. I want to speak about both parts of this Bill and let me also say this is one of the oddest titled Bills I have ever seen. There is nothing to do with regulatory reform here. This is in the first part an anti-union Bill and have no doubt about that, it's an anti-union Bill, there's no regulation there. The second thing is that you're interfering with attempts on the part of local governments to try to do something about air pollution in their jurisdiction. Let me say first on the labor part of the Bill that both Representative Hall and Representative Glazier said is exactly right. For those of you who were here last time in the last session you remember that this issue came up at 1:00 in the morning. One of our special sessions sometime between 1:00 AM and 1:30 AM we had a vote on the decision to deny NCAE dues check off. That Bill did not deny dues check off to the State Employees Association. The only reason any of us could figure out why this was the case is because NCAE had vigorously opposed the policies of the Republican Majority and NCAE had been more neutral. So was retribution being taken against the NCAE. As Representative Glazier correctly said he predicted a lawsuit, there was a lawsuit and the State is enjoined from enforcing the retribution against NCAE. We have a similar situation here in which the question could be asked.

?? Representative Brawley, but I won’t in the interest of time, what’s the difference...why is it that we can have a dues check off in effect or payment check off for the United Way and United Way typically will accept a monthly check off, you can pay your $120 at $10 a month which is the effect which is similar to a labor union dues check off and we’re not prohibiting union...excuse me, United Way check off. We are prohibiting fire...it’s really firefighters and police officers. In many, many of our cities you have firefighters and police officers who have organizations to operate on their behalf, so in voting for this bill , you’re voting against your local firefighters and local police officers. Please be aware of that. On the second part of the bill, I simply do not understand where my colleague, Representative Brawley, is coming in saying that local government should not do something that tries to reduce pollution, air pollution. The fact of the matter is that it should all right for the city of Durham and in our case, I want to just say that the city of Durham has exactly such a policy, we have a policy that requires large employers to do certain things that will reduce their air pollution, basically the ozone emissions from their automobiles. We require large employers to reduce the amount of commuter miles traveled by their workforce. Why do we want to do this? Because we don’t want a zillion single trips by employees and so the purpose of the local ordinance is to require use of vans, carpooling, etc. by the employer that the employer must organize. Why will we, as a General Assembly, go out after the city of Durham for that kind of plan. You’re going after the city of Durham because it’s trying to reduce air pollution, the ozone footprint. And generally the question, why are we keeping local governments from doing what they want to do to reduce air pollution. It makes no sense to me, except that, once again, this majority is trying to meddle in the affairs of local government. It’s a bad bill. Members, please vote no. Thank you. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman from Rockingham County, Representative Jones, for what purpose do you wish to be recognized. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To see if the bill’s sponsor, Representative Brawley, would yield for a question. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Will the gentleman from Mecklenburg yield? [SPEAKER CHANGES] I yield. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman yields. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Representative Brawley. I wanted to ask you, why…what would you say is the difference between this particular bill and the bill that has been discussed from the last session regarding the NCA e-dues check off. [SPEAKER CHANGES] I thank the gentleman for his question. I believe the previous example that the opposition gentleman have quoted, we eliminated dues check off for one and only one group and continued to do check off for other groups. This does not pick a particular group, but says that since counties and cities cannot collectively bargain with any unions, all unions would be barred from dues check off. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Would the gentleman yield for another question? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Does the gentleman yield? [SPEAKER CHANGES] I do. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Brawley, why not non-profits? That was mentioned as well. Why would you not include them in the bill? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative, non-profits can receive funds from both cities and counties legally under North Carolina law, while collective bargaining units are...or cities and counties are barred from collective bargaining under North Carolina law, so there’s a difference in the legal standing in the two groups in relation to cities and counties. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Would the gentleman yield for one more question? [SPEAKER CHANGES] I will. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Will the gentleman yield? [SPEAKER CHANGES] He does. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Representative Brawley. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Representative Brawley, why would you say that local governments should not just be able to do whatever in this area that would be popular with their voters? [SPEAKER CHANGES] The difficulty is that governments will sometimes do things that are very popular, but for which they do not have legal authority, and we frequently hear the argument, well this is popular with the voters and they re-elect us when we do this, why can’t we do it? The idea that many people say that the genius of the American system is majority rule, and that is not, in fact...

?? ?? DJs-haired system that as of the American System is the protection of the individual frontier and incline times chairman of the talk just about as popular as an insulin ID for a visit and from then on I-major restaurants in the second, 62-out tuition section of the PGA event of an injury to the accident as a person in the body , which is the record, which may be important in this case, the data station as a position without that's just because a time when a person is a reports, it is one 1st amendment protection of the oven on the second because the posse his neighbors collected one in China and India, president-eight engines that power has won all of the view of activity of that, the collection is a tiny and with the hardcopy festival of the process that were taxable of the division of this contest this particular bill, and visions of the constitution half a dozen people as one of the innovative in the political reasons I'm just not in the conference reason for the state of the lap of the passing that is patently unconstitutional bill of one is for that industry body, as an hour to the timing is just one of the only real regardless of what a political views of its loss of the labor unions of this is just a plane crash and timing could just the discussion from 1/2 now the question for the house is a passage of time 677 on a 70-fat without all-white men and women ?? of this issue time for one of the machine and the dow has been said before Monday's meeting time, the house finance hospital 677 on saving and without the national inventors of Johnson called on effects for the times down from 29% interest is the quantity of gems renowned ?? in a fiery debate all right for the media interest to the body to date: may die six or time for O'Neal's rules apply to ring all rigid way for calls were indicates on one page of the courses county time share that with an for the purpose is to have a couple of dollars in-time masters and scenic question shoveling me a packet this question of when the 630% ?? of the windows are divorced or another since it was in Thailand activity of a innocence and this has accepted the map as a driver is on the other circuits or up the U.N. is the time dollars and has been stayed calm, if you do not intend to the recognize that this is all the data, he heard behind a little time for and no of the latest share with us. I don't recommend timely as the long as I've indicated that the doll assets in reading the union dues of the party CNN on CD ?? only about one of the other half is not the case of distinction with the paging firm Forstmann education in fact the birdies and rising all 88: Seagate members nor a community of this one is a rough time region did not single out a CD packages, part of the all the newspapers advised Mr. Peter ?? ??..................

Tiled in the seventies of an up some people of seven straight up for it was for the four members of the governors of timeouts pages are apologize for smaller and debate, to the report is coming out last June when times, that session, that is not a question for the house-passed bill sets a sun August 13 of this event, say, time-business and that none of the anti-?? and houses 677 has passed its operating and was sent to the senate ?? hospital center's 65 that the only made seven of the hospitals and timeout of the bottle neck confines of the jury instructions for market has been reported in Singapore County Commissioner Johnson and author of the person they simply say that today and the time has been no recognition of Israel’s of hospitals 7625 seven to clarify and to hell the times of the nation's only way the Work Station nation, commissioners across state of the Federal all the stakeholders and I'll Association capers there's an association of boards of education defend their first day of her as this mail using the instructions for the quarter for a time-sharing and that entails the court with the jury considering calls sources of funding and said that there's some of the time and have this year's support this association for education support of this free-standing juniper's July was estimated at it, but I'm as the best of the house may substitute number to 2060, 70 aldermen of all-time of challenge to hire 115 at the Dept of White house may substitute 1 to 2016 of his passes are eating the fish and reread their sometimes it all for one person at the station purpose as a people as 1661 ?? you it was evident as a house in 64 ways, the rear and the reason house basis to cover 2 to 4060 proposition for the tile in a question for the house passed the house may substitute number 2060, stirring Alderson not all president has a house may substitute number 2016, stresses timing will be sent to 7073 partly house bill place at the browsers into a building contractor busting the condition of the towns and cities made in state buildings all trials in a similar one-to-station purpose that is why the genocide has made no -this maker of his addresses the issues of land use on the summit is one of our times in five cities and towns of the Reginald owned stations was in the senate last session ended up as 1000 time you read these of the areas where cities and counties might acquire and is why I'm on Nixon’s factions of the original bill reduce Medicare into one sport, has embedded in may and also had presidential structures send mail of the second, as well as-best moments-bill and is wider than Las edition and time for that, what we have our successes and found a little inspiration cents , and only this time is to make sure more than landowners and properties with trouble war with the police complain prominent role of the problems in the end of the land is with forgotten as a police wanted lenders , we have situations where see ?? and an often repeated so often, so people a sense, but for in the formal Handover daughters and granddaughters activists are often as for smaller than the pentagon correspondent no one's ?? to the women's 595 session, but if not question for the house-passed bill ?? ??..................

These were counties who were requiring 100% registration, everybody has to sign up so they will know who you are, in case you do something wrong they can find you. And in some cases even to the point of having to publish seven by twenty-four contact information by placing a sign inside the front door of all of your rental units. In many cases there is a fee required to register which is designed to do full cost recovery so that the program is completely paid for by landlords. There has been no duty by police to notify landlords of problems with their property, and in fact you may not know you have trouble until you suddenly discover you've been on double-secret probation and you've hit the bad list, and the bad list could be different numbers, so we had reduced it to 4% in the bill. We also added duties to the police, that they must notify landlords who are registered, that they must be willing to testify and cooperate in evictions, and that landlords who cooperate actively with police would be held harmless. Now there were several issues raised both in committee and with subsequent discussions with members of the league, and Mr. Speaker at this time I would like to send forth an amendment [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to send forth an amendment the clerk will read [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative W. Brawley moves to amend the bill on page one lines 29 through 34 by rewriting those lines to read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the amendment [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker what the amendment does is on the inspections within blighted areas it recognizes that while for small towns one square mile is sufficient, for larger cities and larger areas it's not, so we have put in 5%, and this does not have to be a contiguous 5%, a total of 5% of the land area of your city or county can be designated as blighted and subject to extra inspections. We retain the 4% being the required, the bad list for the rental registration but put in two other qualifiers that would allow landlords to come within the plan. One is any unit that has three incidents within a rolling thirty-day period, or seven incidents within a twelve-month rolling period, and we particularly like the first one because if someone bad moves in and starts to act up you don't have to wait a long time or wait until they get to be in the top 4%, after three times the police are out they're added and you can start working on them. We also added an appeal process for landlords that feel they've been unfairly targeted, and just as kind of a personal note, some of my insights from this came from an accidental experience as a landlord of a troubled property early in my career as a broker I was asked to just sit at a place because they had fired the manager, it was an extended-stay hotel, the client of our firm had bought it with the intent to convert it into elder condos, there were three buildings, one they had emptied. I came out, and by the end of the first week I discovered that what we had bought was a hot pad of crime, and the way I discovered this was I thought, why don't we put in drug testing for the employees, and at the end of my first week I only had two employees left, and none of my security people, so I approached the police about hiring off-duty and one of the officers said, "You do know you're in the top three for calls for service in Freedom Division, don't you?" Now the Freedom Division included Wilkinson Boulevard which had the no-prostitution zone, it had Freedom Drive, it had Bradford which was the hotbed of the shooting galleries and when I went out at night I discovered that after we closed the office the portico in front of it became a stroll where ladies of the late afternoon whose amateur status was definitely in doubt would stand out from under the weather while people would come in and make whatever arrangements. I hired off-duty police and said, "I don't want you to just kinda keep an eye on things, I want you to enforce every law in the city of Charlotte." Over the course of four months we were able to reduce the crime rate in the Freedom Division, or at least in that block by 67%. The property I managed went from fifty-eight calls for service down to less than one. We shut down two prostitution rings, two drug rings, a gun-smuggling ring, one group that was attempting to manufacture methamphetamines and got a federal case in human trafficking. The thing that I would say is, one I was scared to death, two I was paying big money to have

police officers some of whom were SWAT officers with machine guns were protecting me. And one day we went through the door with a SWAT team with 20 people and hauled 9 guys out 15 bags of crack cocaine a bale of marijuana. And I never seen so many people in helmets outside of Fort Bragg in my life. I had cooperation with the police but I was paying for it. Landlords who aren't paying for it need to have cooperation. For all our desire to clean up our cities guys like me aren't really the people you want confronting folks that sell guns, folks that cook meth. The police need to be involved that's the main thing we want. The landlords are often victims themselves. Some gangs have a phrase they use which often delivered in Spanish but sometimes in English. It goes simply this Silver or Lead? You take our money and let us do what we want or we will give you the lead of bullets. And see if your successor is more willing to support what they want to do. The purpose of this bill is to bring the police and the landlords closely aligned to do something that we need to do. It's something I seen in my city and I think unfortunately it's true in too many. We are sometimes willing to accept levels of crime in some neighborhoods that we would never accept in our own. This bill is an attempt to get everybody involved to the solution of the problem and I ask for your support thank you Mr. Speaker.[SPEAKER CHANGE]Ladies and Gentlemen we are on the amendment discussion debate on the amendment present of time please state your purpose[SPEAKER CHANGE]Speak on the amendment[SPEAKER CHANGE]Gentlemen do you recognize the debate on the amendment[SPEAKER CHANGE]I like to thank the bill sponsor for work with me on this line 18 and 19 of the amendment actually make sure that vacation rentals can still collect the occupancy tax and simply stating that it authorizes by the state they can still collect that tax So I commend the amendment to you[SPEAKER CHANGE] Representative Wilkins please state your purpose[SPEAKER CHANGE]speak on the amendment[SPEAKER CHANGE]Gentlemen recognize the debate on the amendment[SPEAKER CHANGE]I want to speak to the members of the house briefly I appreciate that representative Brawley is responding to the concerns, many concerns over the expressed by both me and by people from Durham city council and Durham city staff that came to the house government commitee meeting and I appreciate very much that he's working on this however, The change is to the size of the problem that can be looked at essentially in your amendment Brawley goes to 5% as you and I discussed for Durham, Durham has an area of 12% that is working on right now they did the calculation per Representative Brawley's request I understand you and the city had a good meeting on this. 5% is just to low but 5% us better than zero percent and well what we have in the current bill is one square mile 5% to me doesn't go far enough but it is better than the way the bill is now so I'm support the amendment and wish to encourage you to do so as well. Thank you.

I was thinking presented like a place that your purpose. they unveiled to John is recognized to make those amended famous [SPEAKER CHANGES] remembers the house in him speak on behalf of my city arson unit on delegation, the city Council worked very hard in recognition of little high. the high level of slum housing that we haven't around were not proud of it, but we have a lot of slum housing and are a lot of poverty and Garmin a lot of people who need housing no matter what standards it meets the housing needs and as a result of that after seeing, hearing a lot of complaints from people and different parts of the city who are dissatisfied is whether landlords are willing to do to fix up the property. our city Council work to come up with a very carefully crafted bill ordinance that would allow the city to go into areas of the city where there were consistent violations of this of that ordinance in terms of health and safety and make inspections and tell you that in the areas that the city went for the inspection program. more than two thirds of the housing units that were examined at violations of code violations, and the largest violation. the most extensive in the most in virtually all the cases was the fact that the smoke alarm was not working. having aerie's a fire at the smoke alarm is not working terms, Bill Durham 's ordinance is guided by this bill. it simply will not work because of the way in which the bill was crafted the bill requires there to be what problems one by one mentioned in order for the in order for the inspection process to go forward drum recognizes that the problem is widespread across the low income neighbourhoods of the city and is taken developed a program that is proactive in terms of dealing with the problem. it has made many, many corrections for many, many people in the city of Durham, you are harming the health of the people of Durham in terms of their likelihood of having problems with the code violations. not being repaired. if you pass this bill. this is again meddling by state government and the local government. it's almost as if many people here believe in local control, except when they don't, and it seems like again and again, you believe in local control and then you don't you don't with this one members you make a mistake vote for this bill. think of the people. [SPEAKER CHANGES] the people in slum neighbourhoods who need the program. such term has in programs that are prohibited under this bill,please. oh no, thank you revisited about a essential purpose. Satan reformulate his recognized survey to banking the spigot. I wanted to send to my colleagues in opposing this bill of city of Greensboro season as a as a problem but very hard to eliminate and at least two averages. some of the dilapidated house and then we have people we deserve to make sure that it took to have the properties that they are living in that they are meeting those properties are well taken care of, that they are not run down, and that the health of the citizens that live there won't be impacted to wheat.we believe that the boat when it was put in place by the stones him well. I was a good one. it has worked out for our city with opposing this bill and would appreciate your vote of no on this bill. the discussion revisited Alexander. please take a purpose speak on the Billy Jonas recognized the right of Dell 's amended the is the content of this bill was before us. I believe during the last session and we listen to a lot of the same arguments were things that I remember and I want to hold up is that a number of cities had been developing plans that had differences in approach, but all of those plans were aimed at trying to improve the conditions of low and moderate

Goods. I have a number of those neighborhoods in my history and so I speak from a - not a theoretical but a very practical standpoint. I received a call from a lady not too long ago who was complaining about properties around here and complaining about the type of activity that's going on in those properties. Now it turns out that having landlords to register so that the police can find them is something that is helpful in order to get these properties cleaned up. And that's not a philosophical position, that's a practical position. When you go to tax roles to try to find some of these folk, that's like trying to peer behind blue smoke and mirrors, and especially when a lot of these owners live in other counties, other states, sometimes in other countries. And when you've got an alleged drug cartel operating next door, you don't have the time to try to figure out where somebody is in Honduras in order to get something done. And another thing is area, this bill talks about 5% , well maybe that's a lot in some of your cities and counties but 5% of Mecklenburg county or 5% of Charlotte would leave most of the area undefended and would leave the ability of the police to do something on a practical stand point pretty much undercut. And for these reasons and the fact that my city government opposes it, it is not just the political side of the city government but the police side of the city government opposes it, that I cannot in good conscience vote for this measure , and I urge you to join me in voting against it. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate? If not the question before the house is the passage of the house committee substitute to hose bill 773 as amended on its second reading. All in favor vote aye, all opposed vote no, the clerk will open the vote. The clerk allot machine record the vote, 75 having voted in the affirmative and 39 in the negative the house committee substitute to house bill 773 is amended as passed it's second reading without objection. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Objection. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Objection having been raised the bill remains on the calendar. House bill 794 the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee substitute for house bill 794 a bill between [??] act [??] joint legislative elections oversight committee to study of mending the definition of political party and the nomination process of mending the requirements for unaffiliated and write-in candidates allowing for nomination by convention by smaller parties and providing that smaller parties electing to have primaries will have the result determined by the plurality. General assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Saine please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To speak on the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you Mr. Speaker. This is a bipartisan bill, house bill 794, was originally the voter freedom act of 2013. It's been amended in committee to become a study bill to study some of the aspects and challenges of election law changes. In deference to our time tonight we had a similar bill last year, this simply sends it to a study bill or makes it a study bill so that we can study a little further and bring it back. I urge you to support the bill. Thank you. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Luebke please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To speak reason on the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you Mr. Speaker. members of the house two years ago we passed virtually the same bill, I wish we had of been able to pass it out here and send it to the senate right away. This is a good bill, it's fair for the smaller parties, people who want to be in a smaller party. I'm really glad we're going to the study rather than have the bill die but it's a good bill, it's fair to the small parties. Glad we're having the study. Thank you.

So you please vote yes. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate. If not, the question before the house is the passage of the house committee substitute to House Bill 794 on its second reading. All in favor, vote Aye. All opposed, vote No. The clerk will open the vote. Representative Luebke. The clerk will let the machine record the vote. 109 having voted in the affirmative and 5 in the negative, the house committee substitute to House Bill 794 has passed its second reading without objection, will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate. If not, the question before the house is the passage of the house committee substitute to House Bill 794 on its third reading. All in favor, say Aye. All opposed, say no. The Ayes have it, the house committee substitute for House Bill 794 has passed its third reading, will be sent to the senate. House Bill 802, the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee substitute for House Bill 802, a bill to be entitled an act amending the laws related to landlord and tenant relationships and to shorten the time period required to evict a tenant. The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Earle, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The lady is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker and members, this too is a bipartisan bill and we kind of come to this from different perspectives but whether it’s an individual or a business perspective, we all want and expect the same results and this is expecting to be compensated for the product that we provide and we expect for this solution to come speedy and that’s not happening right now. Many of us in here, for whatever reason might have some rental properties, maybe 2 or 3 and then there are others that do this for a business and as I said, you know, we expect for the process to work when there are issues dealing with tenants. We had several meetings, just a little bit of background; I met with many folk, many stakeholders as it relates to coming together to have a balanced bill. Just to let you know, a part of the coalition that came together was judges, the apartment association, crisis assistance ministry, legally there was an attorney that does eviction filings, the local sheriff, his department, North Carolina justice center, the magistrates and the clerk ??. And we all met trying to come together on a bill that would be balanced for all involved. And this bill is all about reducing the time for eviction. And I’ll go through it if you would like but basically, it’s pretty straightforward. It just reduces some of the time periods and as I said, it was a bill that was pretty much a consensus bill and I would ask for your support. Thank you. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Waddell, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Send forth an amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to send forth an amendment. The clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Waddell moves to amend the bill on page 2 lines 1 through 4 by re-writing the lines to read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Friends, purpose of this amendment is to bring smaller counties, small claims courts magistrates into compliance with the law. Right now, the bill as written provides for a 5 day period for any kind of continuance and elements kind of where I am from, several smaller counties across the state, small claims only meet once a week. That means a 7 day period so they would not be in compliance with the 5 day period. Wanna thank Representative Earle for working with me on this. She’s been very cooperative, very helpful and a pleasure to work with you and I encourage your support for this amendment which simply takes a period from 5 days to 7 days to allow our smaller counties to be in compliance with this law. Thank you. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Faircloth, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Excuse me, I have an amendment but it would be later. Further discussion, further debate.

a didn't set for the resident it's not a question about the time the house's passage of the medicine for the president of the house may substitute house 21 time the president of women ?? nodes in the air one as well have been a sudden time of Estes resident of their opposition purpose of this maker of U.S. and foreign bond business analyst john Weston was important one for only resident-and they'll page 31.7284133 on timing sections five and six of the mail and by remembering the remaining sections reportedly because recognize and riled by the speaker of the late forties longest mission were stressed that the time and this is a good the final state, then, in some property of Michigan, go, what is one of his philanthropic college repeated all weekend, the process time the fair housing tenants and to the owners of property and the other schools to have the prospects appear to cause of this highly uncertain that has marred a share option author on the directors agent in section fire which considers all-around for a spot time of his own partition this, but it does have 1¢ in the event is troubling to share trial it's as if county's population at least 300,000 after the issuance of the sun and the clergy of either the common sense to the plight of time and they have, and the property was that important one issue, for the signs to share of sounds like a dual-wide war with a less forces attacked the election, and to the plate-day that they have the power of their eight-car was the Sunday Times as a major turning 7¢ and 29-or 8¢, and has meant that the war, and this section, in the county population some of the story under the long as the five-styled that, answer as to subsection 8% in addition, the person who had a gentle-years was not only the action committees and that not only that, the lifetime disservice of second-December a 10-course with his oracle for that account for the provisions of the not-so us today at the time the summons that his operation of the so-to-wall and didn't play a part number 21 and try it was so are his daughter, serve times the traditional and-a-starred on the county service across his visit, sometimes you're the a-half of it, and that determination and them into the operation, the salary: as high as a national laboratory would use only the jobs are serving process and non- political-processor server to providing workers and 19¢ Chinese Provinces of-for-all shares of common sense action that one of the § this time information about this and then won for adults to the times-a-Z-:: county's one counts the was very concerned about this as the department of evidence does this topic of cervical process that's what it is known as the driver's name is certainly the prices they are professionals at the FBI mayors these of-300,000 more services such as AT&T and less than 300,000 your share of the decide they call them smaller steal the doors are ?? ??...................

He is also concerned about this. This is troubling. The sherrifs are against it. It's going to cause problems. Is going to cost to their counties money. You gonna take money out of the operating accounts of the sheriffs in order to set up for a new employee group that is 21 years old with no training whatsoever, serving the owner of the property. I urge you to support this ammendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Pages, it is 9:00. Where a couple of minutes over. I was allowing representative Faircloth to finish the debate. But thank you for your service this evening. We'll see you bright and early in the morning. You're now released. Representative Floyd, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the amendment, Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker, on Friday I was in conversation all morning with our sherriff. Similar to what Mr. Faircloth mentioned. And as I was talking with the county sheriff attorney, he mentioned something to me that took place some years back about a similar type bill when landlords would use these kinds of individuals to evict low-income individuals out of their property. But that concern rides with the sherriff that he may have to come back and cleanup an unfortunate situation. Those of you who can remember the red light, when lawyers fought the issue, that the red light camera itself was not an authorized law enforcement officer, so therefore the red light camera could not issue a ticket. This is similar to what we're saying here, that un-uniformed person is going to perform a uniformed task, with no training. This may create a chaos when you go to a low income person, and a person standing there saying that I'm here to evict you. And then that low-income person might utilize one of his unique objects that he have in the house, and here come the sheriff, would have to clean up that matter. I think that the ammendment, this is a good bill, but it would help to clarify the situation. Not only that, but the county already served the warrants within a reasonable period of time. Our county stands to lose hundreds of thousands of dollars if this amendment is passed. And you have a 21 year old person, not licensed, but is going to a property at whatever time it is and tell that person that he has a summit from the landlord to evict that person. He may or may not be in uniform, but if he is not in uniform and not been trained, then the sheriff will probably have to come and provide him some assistance. So, I ask you to support the amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The chair assumes all lights that are on are on to debate the amendment. Representative Bill Brawley, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The ammendment addresses a piece of the bill in which a landlord can have a private process server deliver the summons for the small claims court. It's aimed at the largest counties, because they are the ones that have the greatest problem. I mentioned earlier that I had a short career managing property, and before my investor left for Florida for lower tax rates and no death tax, I did occasionally have to do evictions. And one of the problems with doing an eviction is when you pay the sheriff to serve the summons, if he doesn't serve it, you show up in court, you can't prosecute the eviction. If they have served it, but served it by posting, and not actually gotten in touch with the individual, you may get possession of the property, but you cannot recover the past due rent. This portion of representative Earle's bill, of which I'm a cosponsor, allows those largest counties where the problem of the sheriff's department's inability to serve a complaint allows plaintiff landlords the opportunity to pay for private process servers to serve the complaint only. We're not going to have private individuals doing the actual evictions, which is entering the order for possession and escorting people off the property. This is merely to make sure that when you show up for court,

data and times dollars for members ordered $166 for two people that they in fact have been for teachers some time in 4.5 as maybe you can start being reported out -received a call from shared network at the time is a place that permission of the bill and supports the amendment on Lawson fanned out in a supporting the amendment I still want more standoff time NT to have their day before and found an address to the person or organization purpose is to determine who is written a sign of that to the polls behind and this is certainly not a person day: the issuers are time-sharing, the antelope is one of the nation should not have a lot and Lanny R white, that's one days and enter this jewelry designs has not of the DNA person all the standard requires the lottery clients that the share stars as some time in fact he's got to also had a hand concert in fact me that when the time you as well as an issue came up in shares of prostate were given the entries and that he returns, one ??-proof better service and the impact it's his team were styled and that the liaisons and whether to delay and are the cost and not have that the office areas in the times year ahead of me in trouble and we pay a higher the time, small businesses also an awful long as the 21 time paying an alliance into the air all in a dark alley with a buy time some reason we're down to handle through the polls , sheriff's department is making all of you in dollars at the service time they'll have the service to be happy when these fine once this is with us in his only if they want students to go higher than not, the above. I'm not the PE at the $90.00 that's the reason behind he warned that the best line content in $21.00 but they don't supply and 1/2 aisle to be able to call some as it sure does not running attack capable of providing the service matter how easy, but I'll buy that he is not all of the residents have been ?? heat and simmer, stirring the pot and now that many of the shares have been certified as a song that one of the edges that time, as I am making money went from 26: he's decided last hand riled after headlines with the rate of the civil with accusations, and to all times and maintained officers from the sheriff's department just any of the county's the time you have the right we're as the stations: lost in the third inning and has no opposition and that, and how long time some we're seeing of his opposition by his death is not have our share some of the times reply that you live in a R1 black, all happening is that even on a compromise that we want the district station and their hand at the time July 1414 canning shares to 88 o'clock ??????.......................

A art and to death at the end of Thailand and the budget and in fact that was the wind up in the wind of the elected this out, and not only an initial extraction of ??-domain of solder dns you to not to support of Monday's meeting, it is only going to my being not require any time you, or his positive light meal, should not reward ?? as air is not as effective on the only if we are supportive and personnel to play station purpose in writing that is as ready as I mean, this maker of state college and I want to show up for some offers, and Ryan white, here's exciting copy was sent, when all Shearson's time 102-cent weirdest this provision of the day is because a person for wholesome and his wife is a very high as one ?? and beef up the Vance-like county has promised to the state house of right and the state that shares a homemaker such a long time, just like the situation; and also the server of the site chanting, calls for the half- 1,000,000,000 of the descendants of this content although happens Japan: through the chimes-although some structures records written: the hiking persons likely time there was a native of subjects reason is that has made in a second, the state of inventing the county of 2013 , these are: that's the only time the nation, is that the amount of data, all of the city's 4041 return a call so he wanted to raise the rest of the time of the juror in combating that he's on for a person with some assistance person, gateway center purpose and C, and it was a resident at the I've not supported in 1981 insert that into account the past 830-8000 edition noses of timing was as possible appeal precedence invest in San Pablo-flop receded is that whatever is needed in time I'm here-aids, announces last and the ledger if this is it that says they are counting says the cost efficiency and as a master of fine ?? as stands as a console our customer used as evidence or Yucaipa-?? shot down to one lead a full set is not acting as the sheriff's department anticipates later if you pay for services and not much what is the best of his age and riled-last login and painting person point all PlayStation purpose sported riled because there hasn't been an MIT somebody call 77 in a practice that will throw for what one times and the walls inflation's an official is no different from the era of the law in one year marks the family of Fresno their quality of the overtime use was even please know that made the city's business situations of times and is one of the persons are a way station purpose -sign that says that as many dozens of times that of-Life Care of her awful lot of the, the whole issue is more timely the survivors 20001120, sheriff's department at $409 and the driver survived record highs are dangers in formation ?? offers more flies are the matter shares officer all with 55 ?? ??...................

have summary ejectment notices, out of 11,054 filed within the 2 day period prior to the hearing date. And 40 of those that he had to return out of the 55 had bad addresses on them. Information indicates that where there are delays in summary ejectments, it is because of hearing scheduling delays or delays before the papers get to the Sheriff's Office. But Sheriffs are serving the papers in a timely manner. You're picking on the wrong people. I urge you to support this amendment. [speaker change] Representative Earle, please state your purpose. [speaker change] Speak a second time. [speaker change] The lady is recognized to debate the amendment a second time. [speaker change] I guess I need to respond to some of what's been said, also. I'm trying to figure out how to say it, but some of the numbers that Representative Faircloth just quoted are misrepresented. Those are not the same figures that I'm getting, and I'm not going to go into quoting all of those figures. And I did learn how to count well enough to know what might happen to this amendment. But what I do want to say is that the 7 day period that these summons are supposed to be served is not the time that they are being served in. Many times, the clerk of court reschedules or will schedule it out far in advance just so the Sheriffs will have an opportunity to serve it. But I assure you, the numbers that I have are more, far more. And if there was not a problem I would not stand up here before you and express to you that there is a problem. And there is a problem in all of these 5 counties with the way these summons are being delivered. And I just want to appeal to you one more time not to support this amendment. But, should you, just check with your clerk of court and see where the problem is. And it is certainly not with the courts. Thank you. [speaker change] Representative McElraft, please state your purpose. [speaker change] To debate the amendment. [speaker change] The lady is recognized to debate the amendment. [speaker change] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I'm going to support this amendment, but there is certainly some confusion here about what I'm hearing from the realtors, those who have rental property, and what I'm hearing from the Sheriffs. And I think one way to solve this is to object to third on the bill, and to offer an amendment that would state that if these are not served within 7 days, then the Sheriff's Department are not paid their forty dollars. And I'm going to offer that amendment tomorrow. And then maybe these will be properly served, and someone will take the proper authority over getting those served. Or, someone will get their money back. [speaker change] Further discussion, further debate on the amendment. If not, the question before the House is the passage of the amendment sent forth by Representative Faircloth for the House Committee substitute of House Bill 802. All in favor vote aye, all opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will let the machine record the vote. 75 having voting affirmative, and 37 in the negative. The amendment passes. Representative Moore, please state your purpose. [speaker change] For a motion pertaining to the calendar. [cross over] [speaker change] Mr. Speaker. [speaker change] Representative Lubeke. [speaker change] I was in the chamber. I'd like to be recorded as voting aye. [speaker change] The gentleman records voting aye. Ladies and gentlemen of the House, again in recording votes, we have until the end of session to record them. Chair would ask that if we're reading in a bill or if another member is speaking, if the members will hold we'll recognize you in turn. The gentleman will be recorded as having voted aye. Representative Moore, please state your purpose. [speaker change] Motion pertaining to the calendar. [speaker change] The gentleman is recognized to state his motion. [speaker change] Mr. Speaker, move to add the following bills to tonight's calendar: House Bill 116 enact amending the charter of the town of Carrboro. House Bill 219, enact modernizing the ways children born out of wedlock are referenced in the general statutes. House Bill 364, enact to direct the Program Evaluation Division to study the availability of state agencies having to do with

care agents as bill six-a-half of the evidence as bill 626 at about that, for some agencies drive is that it wasn't an ounce of sense any format contents of the destruction of the Lincoln Hospital-Mac-at-once the surtax when senators passed my manager Kim Sir David those enhancements to-day events a day-to-the- ?? without objection of- adjacent activities will be constantly times isn't what are the least, the houses and add to the counter is related to the charity front runners causes to 12 to 16, Wilson deals and I'd share of Haller student minded cities that I'm guessing, one: we have to have us before the center deadline of midnight on Thursday we had some jazz of the result of a sweater 45 minutes of his evening session when you hear about was at one time of his present bills one writer doesn't make our have risen up more for gas for a file history, staffed zero-emission a non-Irish Times four-hour there are defined as those of the defense, and events in the state of the British west the higher the nation is a semi-counter house bill 160 house bill two nights in the house bill 364 house bill 6.3 house bill 626 house and senate for household instead of house bill, many house bill 1006th time women of all his life for women ?? who was important China MFN is on exhibit, since updated divisive atmosphere is unclear what we will have to I'm sorry, not that it will be accidents in this Congress wants it was placing pointers that complement of the previous question are almost the entire staff on Monday and then slowly correct answers the question of the acting Russian for the house businesses and at the buzzer dismissing a few hours and was up again we have a members within time. The three months of free has anyone seen a number of medicine at the signs that the present time us to stay out of the event happens when the subject is one of them made the Idaho one Davis of summit system and indicated that go if we are all these buildings as we wanted to know about the commitments made by a practice is of little bit of time the only data seasons as way that these wheat and croissants and you'll get the session more, and you suddenly have known as the forties with the only one ?? person is unsurpassed idea of the 1970s bills of the dollar rose 1. in time for res 1 hour, the U.S. invasion of your the controversial measure is ?? you acted as though the operators of per-share a bases of this year this year specifically our requested only bills of the time, first of the acts as well, at the event was before the house is as bad as does a number of older men, all President Clinton ?? who was important and time-is limited, something most presses ?? ?? at Hazen that has ever always has been harassed and sitting out the same intensity for Zedillo was 1 to 10 victory time one ?? ??..................

wanted to make sure she was back in the chamber before the second vote. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate on the House committee substitute to House Bill 802 on its second reading? If not, the question before the House is passage of the House committee substitute to House Bill 802 as amended on its second reading. All in favor vote aye, all opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will have the machine record the vote. 110 having voted in the affirmative and 4 in the negative. The House committee substitute to House Bill 802 as amended has passed its second reading and without objection--objection having been raised the bill remains on the calendar. House Bill 813, the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee substitute for House Bill 813, a bill to be entitled, "An Act to Make the Manufacture, Possession, Sale, Use, Delivery of all Synthetic Cannabinoids Unlawful." General Assembly of North Carolina, enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Horn please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Ladies and gentlemen of the House, this bill passed the Judiciary C unanimously. It is a final answer if there is such a thing to artificial cannabinoids. That's K1, Spice, bath salts, and now the new one, Bizarro. A new stim, Bizarro, I thought you'd like that. Anyway, this is a bill we worked out with FBI, DEA, pretty much everyone you can think of in law enforcement. I'm happy to have the support of Representative Fisher. A number of people on both sides of the aisle are working out this wording. I'd appreciate your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate? If not the ques.... The gentleman, I'll come back. I'm putting the question. I'll come back on third reading. If not the question before the House is the passage of the House committee substitute for House Bill 813 on its second reading. All in favor vote aye, all opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will let the machine record the vote. 113 having voted in the affirmative, none in the negative. The House committee substitute to House Bill 813 has passed its second reading without objection. It will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] General Assembly of North Carolina, enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Brandon, please state your purpose. Further discussion, further debate? If not the question before the House is the passage of the House committee substitute to House Bill 813 on its third reading. All in favor say aye. All opposed say no. The ayes have it. The House committee substitute to House Bill 813 has passed its third reading and will be sent to the Senate. House Bill 832, the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee substitute for House Bill 832, a bill to be entitled, "An Act to Protect the Public's Health by Increasing Access to Immunizations and Vaccines Through the Expanded Rule of Immunizing Pharmacists." General Assembly of North Carolina, enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Avila, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. To send forward an amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The lady is recognized to send forth an amendment. The clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Avila moves to amend the bill on page 3, line 8, by rewriting the line to read.... [SPEAKER CHANGES] The lady is recognized to debate the amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We thought we better make it very clear that we were administering the vaccine for influenza and not the influenza as it was written. Just a purely technical correction there. Briefly, what this is is a big change in North Carolina's health care law. There are lots of organizations that have spend countless hours discussing this, working out concerns and hesitations about taking this step, and all of them need to be commended for the effort that they have put into this and the concern they have for the citizens of the state of North Carolina. What the bill will do is to create, as it does in section one, a condition.... [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Wilkins, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Inquiry of the Chair. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman may state his inquiry. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Do we need to dispose of this amendment before moving to the bill? [SPEAKER CHANGES] The Chair was either going to use the debate time now or a few seconds from now, but point taken. Further discussion, further debate on the amendment? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the amendment sent forth by Representative Avila to the House committee substitute for House Bill 832. All in favor vote aye, all opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will let the machine record the vote. 113 having voted in the affirmative, none in the negative, the amendment passes. The lady is recognized to....

To continue to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As I said, in section one, we introduce the definition of a immunizing Physician. And you can see the specifications there [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Moore, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Would the lady from Wake yield to a question? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Does the lady yield? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Yes. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Is the lady aware of any opposition to the bill? [SPEAKER CHANGES] I don't know. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Okay. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Just briefly, because of all the time and effort that was put into this, I'd like to give a little bit of what the people have put their effort into, if you don't mind. I appreciate it. You messed up my speech. Basically, what we're doing here is allowing pharmacists to be able to give some preventative vaccines. Briefly, if you remember in last few weeks over in Orange and Alamance county, we an issue of whooping cough outbreak, and having this available for the public would definitely be an improvement. And I would ask for your support on the bill. Thank you very much. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Gil, please state your purpose. Further discussion or further debate? If not, the question before the house is the passage of the House Committee substitute to house bill 832 as amended on its second reading. All in favor, vote aye. All opposed, vote no. The clerk will open the vote. All members wishing to record, please do so. Representative Goodman. Clerk will lock the machine, record the vote. 112 having voted affirmative, none in the negative. The house committee substitute to house bill 832 as ammended his past its second reading, and without objection. Will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] ?? Senate of North Carolina ?? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate? If not, the question before the house is the passage of House Committee substitute, house bill 832 as amended on its third reading. All in favor, say aye. All opposed, say no. The ayes have it. The House Committee substitute house bill 832 as amended has passed its third reading. The bill will be engrossed and sent to the senate. House bill 850. The clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee to substitute for house bill 850, a bill to entitle an act to ?? a person who alerts an officer of the presence of a hypodermic needle or other sharp object possessed by the person prior to a search by the officer shall not be charged with possession of drug paraphernalia, possession of the needle or others are sharp object. General Simmon of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Mcneil, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Fellow representatives. House bill 850 changes general statute 98113-22 to provide that prior to a search of a person, an officer may when they're searching a person, vehicle or a home, ask that person if they have a hypodermic needle or other sharp object. If that person so discloses that they have a sharp object, then that person would not be prosecuted for that crime. This is a law enforcement safety bill, designed to reduce the number of officers they get needle sticks, and exposed to a communicable disease. It is supported by the North Carolina sheriff's association. 70% of officers say that the threat of being stuck by needle is of a great concern to them. It passed judiciary A with a favorable report. I commend the bill to you. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Brandon, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To speak on the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'm the odd man out on this bill, and I'm not sure whether I'm gonna vote for it or vote against it, but I do want to bring up the point that I made in judiciary about this bill. First of all, we have a culture in this country and in this state of treating criminals differently. And this bill does that in terms of if you are a heroin addict, and if you do heroin, we're going to treat you differently than we treat other people that have drugs and might have paraphernalia. So, basically what this bill says is that if you shoot heroin up, if you use a needle, we're going to give you an out. But if you just do pot, and you have a bowl in your car, then you still get the charge. And to me, I think I have a problem with that. It's the same thing we did with crack cocaine. We have one law for crack, we have one law for cocaine. There's no difference in it. And so I would like for us to look and consider the fact that if we're going to make laws like this that we make it consistent. That drug addiction is drug addiction. Paraphernalia is paraphernalia. And not one group of people should have an out and another group of people should not. The second thing I would like to add about this bill is that it where does it stop if we're going to do that?

there's lots of things that sheriffs and law enforcement come encountered with that could hurt them. Are we going to saw a law that, hey, if you disclose the fact that you have a firearm in your car it might hurt me? So if you disclose that you're not going to be charged with possession of a firearm. And the list can go on and on and on. But my bigger point to this is that, I have a problem with the fact that we're having a two tier system with the way we deal with drug addicts, and if you're a drug addict of this kind you get this out. If you're a drug addict of this kind you do not get the same privilege. [NEW SPEAKER] Representative McNeill, please state your purpose. [NEW SPEAKER] To ask Representative Brandon a question. [NEW SPEAKER] Representative Brandon, does the gentleman yield? [NEW SPEAKER] Absolutely. [NEW SPEAKER] The gentleman yields. [NEW SPEAKER] Mr. Brandon, have you ever searched a heroine addict? [NEW SPEAKER] I have not. I have not searched a heroine addict and I also have not ever pulled over anybody with a firearm in their car either. I understand the point and I understand the safety point. My point is is that we continue to make a two tier system. Those who do this type of drug get this treatment, those who do that type of drug get that treatment. And I have a problem. I do understand what you're saying. I understand that the sheriffs, they have a tough job. We understand that. And I want to make sure that we pass laws, and things like that, to make sure that they're safe. But if the unintended consequence is that you have a group of addicts, or a group people who break the law get one treatment, and people who break the law get another treatment, that is not what our Justice Department is for. That's not what our justice system is for. You can name lots of things that a sheriff or police will encounter that might hurt them. It's their job. That's what happens. So, my point is that, we just have to be careful in making sure that we don't create two tier systems for this criminal and then we have another one for that criminal. [NEW SPEAKER] Mr. Speaker? [NEW SPEAKER] Representative Glazier, please state your purpose. [NEW SPEAKER] To see if Representative McNeill would yield for a question. [NEW SPEAKER] Representative McNeill, does the gentleman yield? [NEW SPEAKER] I do. [NEW SPEAKER] The gentleman yields. [NEW SPEAKER] Thank you Mr. Speaker, thank you representative. I just want to be sure I'm right, and I think I am. The sole purpose of this bill is to protect officers and safety of the officers. It's not to make distinctions. It's not to give benefits to a particular class of defendants. It is to protect the officers, is that not correct? [NEW SPEAKER] That is the sole purpose of this bill. I can assure you I'm a retired law enforcement officer and I have no time for giving breaks to criminals. [NEW SPEAKER] Thank you Representative. [NEW SPEAKER] Representative Insko, please state your purpose. [NEW SPEAKER] To debate the bill. [NEW SPEAKER] The lady is recognized to debate the bill. [NEW SPEAKER] Thank you Mr. Speaker. Sometimes we solve problems incrementally. We are needlessly exposing our law enforcement officers to Hepatitis C, to AIDS and other illnesses. We don't need to do that. Please vote for this bill. [NEW SPEAKER] Further discussion, further debate. If not, the question before the house is the passage of the House Committee substitute to House Bill 850 on it's second reading. All in favor vote aye. All opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will let the machine record the vote. 111 having voting the affirmative, and two in an unlikely alliance. The House Committee substitute to House Bill 850 has passed it's second reading and without objection will be read a third time. [NEW SPEAKER] General Assembly of North Carolina, next. [NEW SPEAKER] Further discussion, further debate. If not the question before the House is the passage of the House Committee substitute to House Bill 850 on it's third reading. All in favor say aye. All opposed say no. The ayes have it. The House Committee substitute to House Bill 850 has passed it's third reading. It will be sent to the Senate. House Bill 918, the clerk will read. [NEW SPEAKER] Committee substitute for House Bill 918, a bill to the Refiling Act to alter the reporting schedule for independent expenditures and election year communications to provide information in a timely fashion. General Assembly of North Carolina is next. [NEW SPEAKER] Representative Debra Ross, please state your purpose. [NEW SPEAKER] To speak on the bill. [NEW SPEAKER] The lady is recognized to debate the bill. [NEW SPEAKER] Thank you Mr. Speaker. This is a bill that came from good government groups and also from our new head of the Board of Elections, at least in a couple days, Ms. Strach. What it does is it makes reporting for electioneering communications and independent expenditures more regularized and more transparent. Many of you have experienced those kinds of expenditures and people want to know where's this coming from, who's doing it, and this does a lot

this forward in that area on it. the bipartisan bill and on. there's absolutely no objection to it that we had an election law unhappy answer any questions related spam major purpose is a gentleman is recognized and more than a minute of our great and then Stan Winston and develop an online and by deleting agent was recognized during the amendment [SPEAKER CHANGES] madam speaker in generally adaptability is a clean up bill better transparency, better,easier to understand reporting, but it occurred to me that our state board of elections office and more time investigating the important stuff and recording the important stuff it what it wasn't inundated with paperwork. I think it don't matter, and also it could be a trap for the unwary. the person doing it independent expenditure may be mom-and-pop or a daughter and son, or whatever you do in a small expenditure. they can possibly affect the election. so all this amendment does not clearly with all three of the prime primary sponsor Virgin Lewis Lincoln Roth it just raises the threshold little bit to a three hundred dollars a municipal races keeps that the thousand dollars in other races because as you know the thousand dollars. this didn't affect the election and ill keep a lot some of the paper work out of the portable action and live give them more time to accomplish the rumination time of the adoption of the amendment and support the bill [SPEAKER CHANGES] presented Ross procedure purpose to speak on the amendment related to recognize the regimen of [SPEAKER CHANGES] thank you ladies and gentlemen on on that I'm not that object to the amendment, though I was told it was only could be to raise up to five hundred on so we just right now people start reporting it. one hundred and so keep that in mind when you vote on the amendment further discussion thread. it made on the amendment, [SPEAKER CHANGES] if not a question of whether houses the passage of the amendment set forth are represented Stamford has to be substituted out of managing all favour by not all)of our popular heart-lung machine or the one hundred twelve admitted affirmative into in the negative. the amendment passes were now back on the bill further discussion for the debate on the bill rubs a ruggedly sacred purpose to ask the bill sponsor question Representative Ross is the lady of ideal palladium eight-man [SPEAKER CHANGES] if you could do it correctly on this, but the greatness over the weekend, and this is no language on page one goes through and identifies who these independent expenditure people or entities are and of course want to three and for that page are pretty self-explanatory, but I'm a really concerned about number five and eighty can explain this to me because it asks for the names and addresses of all entities that donated to to that particular entity and my question would be is is the NRA or maybe a labour union or something like that considered an entity that would make the and independent contribution, and if that is so what they would does Steve have to find out every single person who donated to those groups will answer to that question is yes, but when they donate when anybody donates more than fifty dollars start campaign, even if it's a fat contribution that all had to be reported. so this is a hundred dollars so I don't see how that is anyone onerous for independent expenditure committees than it is for all his candidates. what we have to report and we have to report on all that information for anybody who donate fifty dollars or more. so they actually get off a lot easier because it's a hundred dollars, although please was bigger than you are you are you okay so basically the area that I got married. besides the Rane and independent expenditure ad for for myself. for example, they would have to then report to the board of elections every single dona tor that donated to the NRA would that be correct. now that would not be correct, it would be people who donate over a certain threshold limit, which is double the threshold limit for anybody who donates to our camp

Though it's not anybody who donates it's people who donate over a certain amount. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Further discussion, further debate. Representative Brody, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Okay, just for one clarification. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: ?? [SPEAKER CHANGES]: I'm sorry, ask a further question please. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Representative Ross does this lady yield? [SPEAKER CHANGES]: I yield. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: The lady yields. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Okay, just for clarification. Now a coordinated expense is one where you would donate to the candidate or you would donate in coordination with the candidate. An independent expenditure is something that the candidate knows nothing about or has no doing about the donation. So, therefore, same question, would somebody who would be let's say a labor union would want to run an ad for you would they then have to in turn report every single member of thatt labor union who is part of that entity. Because the Bill says you're part of it and donated to it. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: If a person donated more than 100 dollars, that would have to be reported. In the same way that if a person donates more than 50 dollars to our campaign, it would have to be reported. It gives the public information about who is disseminating information in elections, and in a large degree it gives more of a shield to these independent groups than it does to us, but this Bill requires more frequent reporting so that people can know during the course of the election cycle. And this won't benefit one party or the other because both sides do it. It's about the public knowing who is paying for the information that's being disseminated. Again, it was supported by both sides of the aisle and it's particularly supported by the State Board of Elections just because they get all of the complaints about these ads and these things and they want to be able to track down who did it and whether or not they are violating the law. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Representative Cleveland please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: To speak on the Bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: The gentleman is recognized to debate the Bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: I'm having a problem here. If I understand the debate correctly, anyone that donates money to an organization, over 100 dollars, and that organization runs an independent ad in a campaign, then that organization is going to have to provide all the names of anyone that donated. I just... it sounds good, transparency but what do we have? We have some organization that runs an ad in a campaign, it has 7 million donors, maybe three-and-a-half million of those donated 100 dollars or more and they're going to be required to provide that information to the Board of Elections. I honestly do not see where that's going to benefit transparency one bit outside of having another big data base that someone's going to have to take care of. If we know the organization that ran the ad, I think that would be sufficient. I really have problems with this portion of the Bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Representative Stam please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Speak the second time on the Bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: The gentleman is recognized to debate the Bill a second time. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: Thank you. It's the first time but I'll treat it like the second time. I do support the Bill. This is not a new concept. These contributions are to further that independent expenditure. This is not talking about the general dues that somebody might have paid toward an organization that does an independent expenditure, but I'd encourage you to vote for it. The Election Law Committee passed it unanimously, if I recall correctly, and of course, our Election Law Leader, David Lewis wrote it, so I think you can trust that. [SPEAKER CHANGES]: And Representative Ross the Chair appreciates your carrying the Bill. Ladies and gentlemen of the House this is one of the primary sponsors, Representative Lewis, his daughter had to be taken to the

That’s why he’s absent today. The Chair appreciates the member from Wake carrying the bill. Representative Floyd, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the bill, Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill as amended. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Someone said that the bill came out of the election committee ?? and I don’t think so but I did really support the bill. The reason for that is how much do we, in this chamber think the board of election can undertake. We have a similar bill and they’re concerning the metropolitan plan or organization that they are to report in and I do not believe that the board of election has an enough ?? to handle all additional duties that have been given to them and doing election cycle, you know, that’s a lot of energy and a lot of time. I didn’t support the bill at that particular point of time and I’m tossing right now should I vote for it ??. The board of election cannot continue to take on additional staff and additional responsibility without some money coming from somewhere. So, I’m at a loss right now, Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Ross, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To speak a second time on the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The lady is recognized to debate the bill a second time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Ladies and gentlemen, I just wanna make it clear that the board of elections very much want this bill. They get a lot of complaints about independent expenditures, they get a lot of complaints where people don’t know what is going on. Again, they get these complaints from both sides and they get inquiries from the public because they wanna know what’s going on with these campaign ads. So it is something that the board of elections is very much in favor of and the new head of the board of elections spoke in the committee in favor of the bill. I commend it to you. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Moore, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker, I ask ?? house that we be allowed to get past 10’o clock so that we may complete our calendar. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Without objection, so ordered and ladies and gentlemen, we may not complete the calendar. We would at least like to get rid or dispose of the bills that were on the original calendar and then we’ll see if we can touch on some of the other ones. Representative Brody, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Speak on the bill, please. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Just for the record, I’m gonna oppose the bill and that number 5 is just clean frightening. You’ve gotta read it. The names and addresses of all entities that donated to further ?? expenditure. That’s everybody, everybody who’s ever donated to the entity. The other thing is I wanted to point out that if you read the bill, 7 times in this bill they list a new report or an additional report down here. So, what this is creating is just more reporting and besides what I’ve been talking about in the beginning, can you imagine the size of those lists that are gonna come in to the board of elections. So, I’m asking you to oppose this bill. Thank you. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Ladies and gentlemen, we have a continuing number of lates coming out for this bill. This bill is gonna be temporarily displaced. We will come back to it before we leave this evening. House Bill 60, the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee substitute for House Bill 60 a bill to be entitled an act to terminate leases at the Indian cultural center site and then sell or allocate certain portions of the property, as recommended by the joint legislative program evaluation oversight committee. The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Howard is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker and I’d like to send forth an amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The lady is recognized to send forth an amendment. The clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Howard moves to amend the bill on page 2 line 37 by rewriting the line to read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The lady is recognized to debate the amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker and members of the house. This is a very simple amendment. It just indicates the 7300 dollars that is needing to be appropriated for the appraisals in order to expedite moving of this piece of property would be in place. Now I’d ask for your support on the amendment. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate on the amendment. If not, the question before the house is the passage of the amendment send forth by Representative Howard to the house committee substitute number 2 for House Bill 60. All in favor, vote Aye. All opposed, vote No. The clerk will open the vote.

...the clerk will [inaudible] machine record the vote. 110 having voted in the affirmative, and none in the negative, the amendment passes. Representative Howard is recognized to debate the bill as amended. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker and members of the House. I really don't believe there's any objection to this bill; this bill came from the Program Evaluation Committee, it has the directive of terminating the two leases that are currently on the property, and directive to sell one parcel and donate the other three parcels to [inaudible] for river access and a park, and I would ask for your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Iler, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To be recorded as voting aye on the amendment, Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman will be recorded as voting aye. Representative Charles Graham, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To speak on the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill as amended. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Members, this is a move in the right direction for this property. It puts the culture center in Robeson County, hopefully in a track that will further develop this property and it will be used for its intended purpose, and I do appreciate the support. Thank you. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House Committee substitute number two to House Bill 60 is amended on its second reading. All in favor, vote aye. All opposed, vote no. The clerk will open the vote. [pause] The clerk will [inaudible] machine record the vote. 112 having voted affirmative, none in the negative, the House Committee Substitute number two to House Bill 60 is amended as passed its second reading; and, without objection, be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House Committee Substitute number two to House Bill 60 as amended on its third reading. All in favor say aye; all opposed say no. The ayes have it, the House Committee Substitute number two to House Bill 60, as amended, is passed its third reading. The bill will be engrossed and sent to the Senate. Ladies and gentlemen, we're now starting on the--some of the items--that were on the supplemental calendar. House Bill 116, the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] [unintelligible 2:18-2:21 ] [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman will yield. The clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee Substitute for House Bill 116, a bill to be entitled an act, to amend the charter of the town of Carrboro, to provide the vacancies in the office of alderman shall be filled by appointment in accordance with the North Carolina General Statutes, or may be filled through a special election process under certain conditions. General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Foushee, we're gonna [sic] recognize you for the debate, but Representative Floyd, did you have a question before we recognize Representative Foushee? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Inquiry, chair. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman may state his inquiry. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker, given the number of bills that have been added to the calendar, enquire of the chair [sic] that can any of those be grouped? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Unfortunately, the only bill that could be grouped is the bill that is before us now, it's a local bill and it's the only local bill. Representative Foushee, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker, on the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The lady is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Member of the House, this bill was filed at the request of the town of Carrboro Board of Aldermen, this is a local bill that will give the town of Carrboro the option to fill a vacancy of less--of more than--a year, by appointment or by special election, was approved unanimously in government. I know of no opposition to the bill; I urge your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion; further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House Committee Substitute to House Bill 116 on its second reading. All in favor say aye; all opposed say no. The ayes have it; the House Committee Substitute to House Bill 116 is passed its second reading. Without objection, will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts-- [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion; further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House Committee Substitute to House Bill 116 on its third reading. All in favor say aye; all opposed say no. The ayes have it, the House Committee Substitute to House Bill 116 is passed its third reading, will be sent to the Senate. House Bill 219 the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee Substitute for House Bill 219, a bill to be entitled an act, to modernize the ways children born out of wedlock and re-reference in the General Statutes by removing references to illegitimate we used in connection with an individual and to bastardy and to make other technical corrections to the Statutes being amended. The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Saine, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Mr. Speaker, members of the House, this bill is twenty-eight sections. I'd like to do them one by one [unintelligible 4:55-4:58] 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8. All right, this [end of data...]

Bill does absolutely nothing. But it actually does one thing important. You may recall about a month ago, Representative Davis and I did a bill regarding the property rights of what were called illegitimate children. And I said I did not like that term because no child is illegitimate. I asked the staff to find 28 places, every place in the general statutes, where they were referred to as illegitimate children and change it. And that's what this bill does, 28 times. So if you would like to get that term and the term bastardy out of the general statute, vote yes on the bill and save the explanation of the other 27 sections. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Further discussion? Further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House committee substitute to House Bill 219 on it's second reading. All in favor vote aye, all opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 113 having voted in the affirmative, none in the negative. The House committee substitute to House Bill 219 has passed it's second reading and without objection will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGE] General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Further discussion? Further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House committee substitute to House Bill 219 on it's third reading. All in favor say aye, all opposed say no. The ayes have it. The House committee substitute to House Bill 219 has passed it's third reading and will be sent to the Senate. House Bill 364 the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGE] House Bill 364 a bill to be entitle An Act To Direct the Program Evaluation Division to Study the Ability of State Agencies or State Entities to Enter Into Debt or Debt-like Arrangements Outside of the Purview of the General Assembly. The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Representative McGrady, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] To debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The bill is simply a study bill to to direct that a study be performed; to look into the debt and debt-like arrangements that are in state government. Representative Rayne Brown, Tim Moffitt and I have worked on this. It's just a study bill and I ask for your support. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Further discussion? Further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House committee substitute to House Bill 364 on it's second reading. All in favor will vote aye, all opposed will vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 113 having voted in the affirmative, 1 in the negative. The House committee substitute to House Bill 364 has passed it's second reading and without objection will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGE] General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Further discussion? Further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House committee substitute to House Bill 364 on it's third reading. All in favor will say aye, all opposed will say no. The ayes have it. The House committee substitute to House Bill 364 has passed it's third reading and will be sent to the Senate. House Bill 623 the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Committee substitute for House Bill 623 a bill to be entitled An Act to Modify Vehicle Weight Limits for a Single-Axle Truck Owned, Operated By or Under Contract to a Public Utility or Electric or Telephone Membership Corporation and Used in Connection With the Installation, Restoration, or Maintenance of Utility Services in Certain Areas. The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Representative Presnell, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] To speak on the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The lady is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Ladies and gentlemen, this was by request of my electric cooperatives in my district. We have roads up in the mountains that are like the tail of the dragon. I don't know if you are familiar with that in Graham County and they just go like a tail and they are hard to get around. But the trucks, D.O.T. had recommended putting a trailer on the back of it but when you put a 60 foot pole, it's too long to go around the corners as swiftly as it needs to go. So, we decided to try modifying the weight limit that they could go over and the only, I have a PCS from the D.O.T., have asked that we do it only west of Interstate 77 and that the effective date is January 1, 2014 so they might be able to look at it if there's any kind of problem. I ask for your support. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Further discussion? Further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House committee substitute to House Bill 623 on it's second reading. All in favor vote aye, all opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 111 having voted in the affirmative and 2 in the negative. The House committee substitute to House Bill 623 has passed it's second reading and without objection will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGE] General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Further discussion? Further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House committee substitute to House Bill 623 on it's third reading. All in favor say aye, all opposed say no. The ayes have it. The House committee substitute to House Bill 623 has passed it's third reading and will be sent

the Senate. Representative Insko, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I'd like to be recorded as voting no on 623 and yes on House Bill 802. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The lady will be recorded as having voted no on House Bill 623 and yes on House Bill 802. House Bill 626 the Clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee Substitute for House Bill 626, a bill to be entitled an act, to promptly notify local law enforcement agencies of certain information by vehicles that have been towed, the General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To explain the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Members of the House, currently in statute when your vehicle is towed, if your vehicle is registered in North Carolina, the towing company has up to 24 hours to notify you of the fact that they've towed the car and where it is being stored. If it's registered outside the state, they have 72 hours to do so. This bill would require the tower of the vehicle to notify local law enforcement having jurisdiction over the area where the vehicle is towed, of a description of the vehicle, the place from which it was towed, the place where the vehicle will be stored, and the contact information from the person who actually towed the vehicle so the owner of the vehicle can retrieve it. This is in response to--typically what happens when someone discovers that their vehicle is towed--they typically call 911 and the emergency operator does not have any information as to where to direct the person to have help. In this instance, they'll be able to direct them to the information officer in the law enforcement agency having jurisdiction and they'll be able to get their hands on the information that they need. I'll answer any questions. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Dollar, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To see if the gentleman from Buncombe would yield to a question. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Does the gentleman yield? [SPEAKER CHANGES] I do. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman yields. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, Representative Moffitt. As we have discussed previously, I think everyone agrees that predatory towing is something that is a concern that people don't want to see. However, the bill may have implications for other towers in the normal course of their business, and I think you would confirm that you're gonna [sic] continue to work with the towing association and others to address some of the concerns that have been expressed to this point. [SPEAKER CHANGES] That's correct, and I also will be working with law enforcement to really put together a better process for this to happen. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you very much. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion? Further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House Committee Substitute to House Bill 626 on its second reading. All in favor, vote aye; all opposed vote no. The Clerk will open the vote. [pause] The Clerk will let the machine record the vote. 113 having voted affirmative; none in the negative; the House Committee Substitute to House Bill 626 is passed its second reading. Without objection, will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion? Further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House Committee Substitute to House Bill 626 on its third reading. All in favor say aye; all opposed say no. The ayes have it; the House Committee Substitute to House Bill 626 is passed its third reading; will be sent to the Senate. House Bill 774, the Clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee Substitute by House Bill 774, a bill to be entitled an act, to exempt certain primitive structures from the building code. The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative McGrady, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To explain the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] This bill is one that would exempt certain primitive camps and primitive farm buildings from the current building code. You may have read about this situation where a summer camp up in Representative Jordan's district was closed down. It was actually meant to be a 1830's example of how people lived and obviously they didn't have cement nor a range of other things including complying with the building code. It came out of committee, I believe, unanimously; and I would ask for your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Jordan, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you, colleagues. I would definitely recommend that you support this. This is the Mountain Man, Eustice Conway; and other primitive camps of that sort. There are a number of them around the state. My family and I, and Representative McGrady went to visit and there's a lot of important teaching and learning going on, but the county of Watauga has decided to shut it down because they don't meet the residential building codes. That's what we need to help in this situation. I'd urge your support of this. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion? Further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House Committee Substitute to House Bill 774 on its second reading. All in favor vote aye; all oppo-[end of data...]

Vote no, the court will open the vote. The clerk will let the machine record the vote. 113 having voted the affirmative, none in the negative. The House Committee Substitute house bill 774 has passed its second reading and without objection will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate. If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House Committee Substitute House bill 774 on its third reading. All in favor say aye. All opposed say no. The ayes have it. The House Committee Substitute House bill 774 has passed its third reading, will be sent to the Senate. Ladies and gentlemen, without objection, House bill 912 will be removed from today's, 918 will be removed from today's calendar and re-calendared for tomorrow. Is there objection? Without objection, House bill 919 will be removed from today's calendar. That was added with the supplemental calendar removed from today's calendar and re-calendered for tomorrow. So ordered, House bill 774 the clerk will read. House bill 810. Chair stands corrected. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Committee Substitute for House Bill 810, a bill entirely enact to modify the county population minimum acres requirements in certain tracks of lands used as cemeteries. General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Bolls, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] To debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you Mr. Speaker. This is just enact the modified bring up the current business practices, and have a good debate, and the committee asks for your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate. If not, question before the House is the passage of House Committee Substitute house bill 810 on its second reading. All in favor vote aye. All opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. All members wishing to record, please do so at this time. Representative McGrady. The clerk will let the machine record the vote. 111 having voted in the affirmative, 1 in the negative. The House Committee Substitute house bill 810 has passed its second reading without objection. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Objection. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Objection having been raised by Representative Stam. The bill remains on the calendar. House bill 1002, the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGES] House bill 1002, bill has been entirely enact provided the city of Bellmont may lease from the Department of Transportation, the department's interest a portion of the Piedmont Northern Rail, carded within the limits of the town of Bellmont. General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Representative Torbett, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. To debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] The gentleman is recognized to debate the bill. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Thank you ladies and gentlemen, speaker and ladies and gentlemen of the house. This bill is a very simple bill. It allows this town of Bellmont, that Representative Bumgardner and I actually share. It gives them the opportunity to raise, to lease a section next to or adjacent to a railroad, to use as a walking path that would pretty much connect the Bellmont Ave to downtown Bellmont. They can't disturb the rail line because it is still, although it is an active rail line, there is no service currently on it. It's been kinda stopped for service just at the line a little bit. But it does provide access, and the only way for them to do that would be through going into a lease with the state of North Carolina. I appreciate your support. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate. If not, the question before the house is the passage of House bill 1002 on its second reading. All in favor vote aye. All opposed vote no. The clerk will open the vote. All the members wishing to record, please do so at this time. Even those playing with rubber bands. Representative Warrren. The clerk will let the machine record the vote. 111 having voted in the affirmative, and 2 disgruntled seat mates have voted in the negative. House bill 1002 has passed its second reading and without objection will be read a third time. [SPEAKER CHANGES] General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGES] Further discussion, further debate. If not, the question before the House is the passage of House bill 1002 on its third reading. All in favor say aye. All opposed say no. The ayes have it. House bill 1002 has passed its third reading and will be sent to the Senate. Ladies and gentlemen, the chair has been advised by Representative McElraft that the lady wishes to remove her objection to the third reading on House bill 802. Is that correct? [SPEAKER CHANGES] Yes sir. [SPEAKER CHANGES] That is, is there any other objection to the, this will be the last bill we dispense with today. Is there any other objection to reading House bill 802?

...that's on page 3 of the calendar, middle of the page. Landlord Tenant Shorten Eviction Time. Is there objection? If not, the clerk will read. [SPEAKER CHANGE] General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Further discussion, further debate? If not, the question before the House is the passage of the House Committee Substitute to House Bill 802 on its third reading. All in favor vote aye, all opposed vote no. The Clerk will open the vote. The Clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. One hundred and seven having voted in the affirmative, three in the negative. The House Committee Substitute to House Bill 802 has passed its third reading and it will sent to the Senate. Engrossed and then sent to the Senate. Representative Jeter, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] I was in the Chamber, would like to be recorded aye as on that last bill. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Gentleman will be recorded as voting aye on House Bill 803. Representative Elmore, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] I need to be recorded as voting yes on House Bill 832. [SPEAKER CHANGE] 832. The gentleman will be recorded as voting aye. Representative Duane Hall, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] I apologize, Mr. Speaker. I need to be, as well, yes for 802. [SPEAKER CHANGE] 802. Duane Hall, yes. Representative Ramsey, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Mr. Speaker, I might be recorded as voting aye on the, I think amendment A2 for House Bill 802. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The gentleman will be recorded as voting aye for Amendment A2 House Bill 802. Representative Holley, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Yes, I'd like to be reported aye on 802. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The lady will be recorded as voting aye on House Bill 802. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Representative Tim Moore, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Motion pertaining to, motion re-referral. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The gentleman is recognized. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Mr. Speaker, Senate Bill 635, short title Transmission Line Ownership. Move that the bill be removed from the calendar, referred to the committee on rules. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Without objection, so ordered. [SPEAKER CHANGE] And Senate Bill 287, Notice Publication by Some Local Governments. Move that that bill be removed from the calendar and referred to the committee on rules. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Without objection, so ordered. Representative Warren, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Mr. Speaker, are we doing announcements? [SPEAKER CHANGE] Not yet. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Thank you. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Ladies and gentlemen of the House, the Chair is happy to report that the bills that we did add to the calendar to this evening were not met with a lot of controversy. The Chair will commit to you that any bills that get added like that between now and crossover deadline will only be taken up if there's not objection. And I'll think you'll see in this particular case it was fairly mixed and all of them were non-controversial. But that will be one way but by processing another 10 bills tonight, it just lessens the load and makes it less likely that we'll have to be here very, very late on the next two or three days. For purposes for planning tomorrow, the committee announcements that are out, I think some are established for 8:30 in the morning, the committees are going to meet. However, when we adjourn tonight, we're going to adjourn to reconvene at 9:30 a.m. Now procedurally, some member could object to the fact that meetings are, that committee meetings are occurring. We will come in at a skeleton session simply so that we can begin to read in committee reports. So we will convene at 9:30 but it will be a skeleton session and we will recess and come back at 2:00 p.m. So committees will essentially meet all morning long. However, we will be in recess so that we will be able to read in committee reports and have the calendar ready by the time we come to session at 2:00 p.m. It's in the intent of the Chair to meet until somewhere between 5:00 and 5:15 and provide a two hour break. And the purpose of that break will be one, so that you can take a break, but two, so that other committee meetings and other things may have to occur. So that will go from probably about 5:15 until about 7:00, 5:00 to 7:00, plus or minus 15 minutes. And the Chair anticipates it will likely be the calendar for the next three days. It's very possible on Thursday, however, that the bulk of that day will be in session disposing of the crossover sensitive calendar items. No bills will be taken up for the remainder of this week that are not crossover sensitive. So if you've got Senate members asking why a bill is not being heard, it's because by definition, it's not crossover sensitive. Notices and announcements. Representative Warren, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] For an announcement, Mr. Speaker. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The gentleman is recognized for an announcement. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Thank you. The House Committee on Government will meet tomorrow afternoon at 1:00 p.m. in Room...

...1128 and we only have about four bills to go through so I'd ask all members to get there early and we'll get out real quick. Thank you. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Representative Howard, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Make an announcement. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The lady is recognized. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Finance will meet at 8:30 in the morning in Room 544. We have six bills that should be on your computers tonight. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Representative Dollar, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] For an announcement. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The gentleman is recognized. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Members, full Appropriations tomorrow morning at 8:30, we've got about 10 bills, that list has been sent out to you and we may also meet at 5:00 or at the 5:00 recess. We will probably finish those bills if we don't get through with them tomorrow morning. So just keep that in mind and watch your e-mails for announcements. Thank you. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Representative Cleveland, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] A point of personal privilege. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The gentleman is recognized for a point of personal privilege. The House will come to order. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As many of you know, my seatmate, Representative Langdon, went to the hospital again this afternoon. I'm happy to report that he's in fine condition. He is the proud owner of two more stents. He's resting comfortably and he's going to go home tomorrow and rest for a couple days. And hopefully he'll stay there at least until the end of the week and get well. But he's doing fine. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Ladies and gentleman, the Chair also understands that Representative Lewis' daughter is doing well and is expected to be able to get discharged from the hospital this evening. Representative Larry Hall, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Announcement. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The gentleman is recognized for an announcement. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Democratic caucus will caucus at 12:00 noon tomorrow. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Representative Bill Brawley, please state your purpose. [SPEAKER CHANGE] For an announcement. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The gentleman is recognized. [SPEAKER CHANGE] I regret to inform you that the Transportation Committee meeting tomorrow at noon is not on the calendar but we will be meeting and have several crossover sensitive bills to address. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Further notices and announcements? Representative Holley, Representative Moore needs some help over here. [laughter] The gentleman is recognized. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Wasn't even a good save on that one. First off, an announcement, Mr. Speaker. The Rules Committee will meet tomorrow at 9:55 a.m. and also need to do a motion for a re-referral. House Bill or Senate Bill 287, which was originally referred back to the Committee on Rules needs to be placed back on the calendar for tomorrow. Reason being there's a House Bill that's somewhat of a companion bill. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Without objection, so ordered. [SPEAKER CHANGE] And now for a motion. [SPEAKER CHANGE] The gentleman is recognized for a motion. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Mr. Speaker, move that subject re-referral bills and resolutions, the House do now adjourn to reconvene on Tuesday, May the 14th, at 9:30 a.m. [SPEAKER CHANGE] Representative Moore moves, seconded by Representative Foushee and subject to the receipt of committee reports, the House do now adjourn to reconvene on Tuesday, May 14th at 9:30 a.m. The motion also includes referral bills and resolutions. All those in favor say aye, all opposed say no. The ayes have it, the House stands adjourned. [tape ended at time stamp 0:03:40.0]